Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39788089›Full record

ReviewNeuron2025

Brain aging and rejuvenation at single-cell resolution.

Eric D Sun, Rahul Nagvekar, Angela N Pogson, Anne Brunet

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuron, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eric D SunDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Biomedical Informatics Graduate Program, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Rahul NagvekarDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Genetics Graduate Program, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Angela N PogsonDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Developmental Biology Graduate Program, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Anne BrunetDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Glenn Center for the Biology of Aging, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. Electronic address: abrunet1@stanford.edu.

Funding

Wnt signaling in muscle stem cell agingP01AG036695 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI MARGARET A. GOODELL · 2011 to 2026
$29.3M
GENETICS TRAINING PROGRAM FOR PHD CANDIDATEST32GM007790 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BRUNET, ANNE, KINGSLEY, DAVID M · 1985 to 2020
$12.8M
T cells in the aging brainR01AG071711 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BRUNET, ANNE · 2021 to 2025
$3.9M
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG036695NIA NIH HHS R01 AG071711NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007790
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain aging leads to a decline in cognitive function and a concomitant increase in the susceptibility to neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases. A key question is how changes within individual cells of the brain give rise to age-related dysfunction. Developments in single-cell "omics" technologies, such as single-cell transcriptomics, have facilitated high-dimensional profiling of individual cells. These technologies have led to new and comprehensive characterizations of brain aging at single-cell resolution. Here, we review insights gleaned from single-cell omics studies of brain aging, starting with a cell-type-centric overview of age-associated changes and followed by a discussion of cell-cell interactions during aging. We highlight how single-cell omics studies provide an unbiased view of different rejuvenation interventions and comment on the promise of combinatorial rejuvenation approaches for the brain. Finally, we propose new directions, including models of brain aging and neural stem cells as a focal point for rejuvenation.

Indexed as

AgingBrainRejuvenationSingle-Cell AnalysisAnimalsHumansNeural Stem Cellsagingbraincell-cell interactionsmulti-omicsregenerationrejuvenationsingle-cell transcriptomicsspatial transcriptomics

Identifiers

PMID39788089
PMCPMC11842159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.