ArticleBiomaterials2025
Systemically administered platelet-inspired nanoparticles to reduce inflammation surrounding intracortical microelectrodes.
Article in Biomaterials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Platelet Products and Artificial Platelets for Regenerative Medicine.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2026Review
- Antimicrobial coated intracortical probes reduce invading microbe abundance and subsequent neuroinflammation.Biomaterials · 2026Article
- Dexamethasone-loaded platelet-inspired nanoparticles improve intracortical microelectrode recording performance.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intracortical microelectrodes (IMEs) are essential for neural signal acquisition in neuroscience and brain-machine interface (BMI) systems, aiding patients with neurological disorders, paralysis, and amputations. However, IMEs often fail to maintain robust signal quality over time, partly due to neuroinflammation caused by vascular damage during insertion. Platelet-inspired nanoparticles (PIN), which possess injury-targeting functions, mimic the adhesion and aggregation of active platelets through conjugated collagen-binding peptides (CBP), von Willebrand Factor-binding peptides (VBP), and fibrinogen-mimetic peptides (FMP). Systemically administered PINs can potentially enhance hemostasis and promote the resealing of IME insertion-induced leaky blood-brain barrier (BBB), thereby attenuating the influx of blood-derived proteins into the brain parenchyma that trigger neuroinflammation. This study explores the potential of PINs to mitigate neuroinflammation at implant sites. Male Sprague Dawley rats underwent craniotomies and IME implantations, followed by a single dose of Cy5 labeled PINs (2 mg/kg). Rats were sacrificed at intervals from 0 to 4 days post-implantation (DPI) for biodistribution analysis using an in vivo live imaging system (IVIS) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) to assess neuroinflammation, BBB permeability, and active platelet distribution. Another cohort of rats received weekly PINs, trehalose buffer (TH, diluent control), or control nanoparticles (CP, PEG-coated liposomes) for 4 weeks, with similar endpoint analyses. Results indicated that PIN concentrations were significantly elevated near IME interfaces acutely (0-4 DPI) and after 4 weeks of repeated dosing. At 3 DPI, peak intensities of active platelets (CD62P), activated microglia/macrophages (CD68), and PINs were observed. Immunoglobulin G (IgG) was upregulated during the first 24 h near implant sites but declined thereafter. At 4 weeks, the PINs group exhibited higher intensities of active platelets and PINs, and reduced CD68 and IgG levels compared to controls. PINs effectively targeted the IME-tissue interface, alongside endogenous activated platelets, resulting in reduced neuroinflammatory and BBB-leakage markers compared to the diluent-only-infused control group. Repeated dosing of PINs presents a promising approach for enhancing the quality of neural recordings in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.