Trial reportNoise & health
Effects of White Noise Intervention on Sleep Quality and Immunological Indicators of Patients with Breast Cancer Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.
Trial report in Noise & health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The effect of white noise on sleep quality and fatigue in community-dwelling older adults: a randomized controlled trial.BMC geriatrics · 2026Trial
- Physical factor therapies for insomnia: a narrative review of mechanisms, clinical evidence, and phenotype-guided applications.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveEvaluate the effect of white noise intervention on sleep quality and immunological indicators of patients with breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).
methodsFrom January 2020 to December 2022, 104 newly diagnosed female patients (the number of people who met the inclusion criteria) with breast cancer who were confirmed to be preoperative NAC by puncture pathology were selected for a randomised single-blind trial. The patients were randomly divided into an observation group and a control group, with 52 cases in each group. The control group of patients received routine NAC treatment. The observation group played white noise at regular intervals every night on the basis of routine NAC, covering the entire treatment cycle. We evaluated the clinical efficacy, safety, sleep quality and immunological indicators of the two groups.
resultsWe found no statistically significant difference in the objective response rate between the two groups (P > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of safety events between the two groups (P > 0.05). The total incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05). After intervention, the sleep latency, subjective sleep quality, sleep duration, daytime function and sleep disorder scores of both groups decreased, and the observation group had significantly lower scores than the control group (P < 0.05). After intervention, both groups showed changes in immunoglobulin A (IgA), immunoglobulin G (IgG), immunoglobulin M (IgM), C-reactive protein and serum interleukin-6, but the differences between the groups were not statistically significant (P > 0.05).
conclusionWhite noise intervention can improve the sleep quality of the NAC population with breast cancer and reduce the incidence of adverse reactions. In addition, it has no effect on the treatment efficacy, safety and immune indicators of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.