ArticleThe American journal of gastroenterology2025
Multitarget Stool DNA Testing for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Clinical Practice.
Article in The American journal of gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and prevalence of colorectal cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of global data.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Pooled it
- Novel colorectal cancer screening methods - opportunities and challenges.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionFew studies have evaluated multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA) in clinical practice. We analyzed mt-sDNA utilization at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.
methodsWe assessed mt-sDNA orders between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2021. Data collection included electronic capture of mt-sDNA orders, completed stool submissions, and test results. Multivariable models were used to assess associations between mt-sDNA completion and results and age, sex, and race.
resultsThere were 91,664 mt-sDNA orders in 73,704 patients. A total of 54.7% (40,337/73,704) completed an mt-sDNA test, and 7,424 (18.6%) tested positive. Completion rates increased by age <50-59 years (N = 12,818; 48.2%), 60-69 years (14,982; 56.3%), and ≥70 years (N = 9,850; 55.6%) ( P < 0.0001). The completion rate for males (52.7%; 15,297/29,025) did not differ significantly from females (53.3%; 22,353/41,901) ( P = 0.09). By race, the completion rates of White patients (54.1%; 34,874/64,512) and Asian patients (56.9%; 493/867) were higher than those of Black patients (38.8%; 1,699/4,376) ( P < 0.0001). Test completion declined with repeat mt-sDNA orders, with ≤32% completion rate after ≥3 orders. In a multivariable model, older age was associated with greater likelihood of a positive test (odds ratio 1.22, 95% confidence interval 1.20-1.24, P < 0.0001), and Black patients had lower odds of a positive test (odds ratio 0.65, 95% confidence interval 0.56-0.76, P < 0.0001). DISCUSSION: Only 54.7% of patients completed their mt-sDNA test order. Older individuals were more likely to complete testing and test positive. Black patients were less likely to complete testing and, unexpectedly, less likely to test positive. Further exploration of mt-sDNA utilization including better understanding of the determinants of uptake, appropriateness, and evaluation of outcomes at colonoscopy is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.