SynthesisThe American journal of hospice & palliative care2026
Sociodemographic Disparities in the Use of Hospice by U.S. Nursing Home Residents: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in The American journal of hospice & palliative care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Private Equity Ownership in Hospice Care: A Systematic Review (2012-2026).The American journal of hospice & palliative care · 2026Article
- Training and Practice Gaps in Nursing Home Palliative Care: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hospice can improve end-of-life (EOL) outcomes in U.S. nursing homes (NHs). However, only one-third of eligible residents enroll, and substantial variation exists within and across NHs related to resident-, NH-, or community-level factors. We conducted a review of English-language, peer-reviewed articles 2008 to 2023 describing this variation in NH hospice use to characterize disparities and inform educational and quality initiatives to improve EOL care in NHs. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We screened 1595 records, reviewed 82 articles and included 13 articles. Eleven used pre-2009 data. Six evaluated national data and 7 used regional (n = 1), state (n = 4), or local (n = 2) data. One assessed hospice referral, 10 hospice use, and 3 length-of-stay. Twelve conducted regression analyses; 1 stratified by race, another evaluated interaction terms, and a third compared racial differences within-and between-facilities. Unadjusted and adjusted differences were evaluated by resident race-and-ethnicity (n = 6 unadjusted, n = 10 adjusted, respectively), sex (n = 5, n = 9), or payor (n = 1, n = 4), or by NH race-mix (n = 1, n = 2), ownership (n = 1, n = 7), payor-mix (n = 1, n = 5), or urban/rural location (n = 1 adjusted). Unadjusted differences showed lower hospice use by Non-White residents and varied results by sex. Studies adjusting for resident-, NH-, and community-level factors found lower hospice use among male residents, Black/Non-White residents, and residents of rural NHs, with mixed results by payor and ownership. Results were mixed for hospice referral and length-of-stay. These findings suggest complex influences on NH hospice use. Further study is warranted to identify targets for improving hospice access.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.