ArticlePloS one2025
Impact of partial occlusion of the face on multisensory emotion perception: Comparison of pre- and post-COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We perceive and understand others' emotional states from multisensory information such as facial expressions and vocal cues. However, such cues are not always available or clear. Can partial loss of visual cues affect multisensory emotion perception? In addition, the COVID-19 pandemic has led to the widespread use of face masks, which can reduce some facial cues used in emotion perception. Thus, can frequent exposure to masked faces affect emotion perception? We conducted an emotion perception task using audio-visual stimuli that partially occluded the speaker's face. Participants were simultaneously shown a face and voice that expressed either congruent or incongruent emotions and judged whether the person was happy or angry. The stimuli included videos in which the eyes or mouth were partially covered and where the whole face was visible. Our findings showed that, when facial cues were partially occluded, participants relied more on vocal cues for emotion recognition. Moreover, when the mouth was covered, participants relied less on vocal cues after the pandemic compared to before. These findings indicate that partial face masking and prolonged exposure to masked faces can affect multisensory emotion perception. In unimodal emotion perception from only facial cues, accuracy also improved after the pandemic compared to before for faces with the mouth occluded. Therefore, changes in the reliance on vocal cues in multisensory emotion perception during the pandemic period could be explained by improved facial emotion perception from the eye region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.