ArticlePLoS pathogens2025
Hepatitis B virus genotypes A1 and A2 have distinct replication phenotypes due to polymorphisms in the HBx gene.
Article in PLoS pathogens, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Occult hepatitis B virus infection among hepatitis B surface antigen negative vaccinated healthcare workers in East Gojjam zone hospitals.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- HBV and host metabolic crosstalk: Reprogramming pathways for viral replication and pathogenesis.Virologica Sinica · 2025Review
- The Molecular Epidemiology of Hepatitis B Virus and Its Resistance-Associated Mutations in the Polymerase Gene in the Americas.Microorganisms · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
HBV genotype A has two major subtypes, A1 (commonly in Africa) and A2 (commonly in Europe) with only 4% nucleotide differences. Individuals infected with these two subtypes appear to have different clinical manifestations and virologic features. Whether such a difference results from the virus or host has not been established. Using HBV generated from molecule clones of subtypes A1 and A2 in cell culture (HBVcc), we demonstrate that HBVcc of subtypes A1 and A2 can be passaged in vitro and in vivo and respond equally well to human IFN-α treatment. HBVcc passaged in human liver chimeric mice (HBVmp) infected human hepatocytes more efficiently than that of the original HBVcc. Subtype A2 showed a much higher viral replication level than that of subtype A1. Mechanistic investigations using constructs with chimeric A1/A2 sequences and specific mutations indicated that subtype A2 has an inherently higher replication phenotype due to specific polymorphisms in the HBx gene resulting in amino acid variations. Studies of HBx expression demonstrated that A1 HBx is expressed at a much lower level than that of A2 HBx. Mutagenesis studies identified two HBx amino acid variations responsible for the observed phenotypic difference. Using AlphaFold2, we generated structural models of HBx proteins of A1 and A2. Superposition of the two models reveal that the overall structural motifs are similarly aligned, except for the C-terminal peptides diverging between the A1 and A2 models, possibly explaining their functional difference. In conclusion, using various in vitro and in vivo models, here we show that subtype A2 has an inherently higher replication phenotype due to polymorphisms in HBx that result in possible differences in structure and expression level of the two subtype HBx proteins. This genotypic difference potentially explains the reported clinical differences between the two subtypes as well as providing a previously unrecognized association between viral sequence variations and clinical manifestations of HBV infection in humans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.