SynthesisPloS one2025
Efficacy of pulmonary surfactant with budesonide in premature infants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy of pulmonary surfactant with budesonide in infants born at or less than 28 weeks' gestation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Pooled it
- Budesonide and Surfactant Therapy Versus Surfactant Alone on Incidence of Lung Disease in Preterm Infants (BEST Lung): Study Protocol for a Systematic Review and Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis With Nested Prospective Meta-Analysis.Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2026Article
- Systemic glucocorticoid activity in extremely preterm neonates after antenatal betamethasone and intratracheal budesonide: a sub-study of the PLUSS trial.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026Article
- Dose-dependent effects of Alveofact with and without steroids on neutrophil extracellular traps in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.Pediatric research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulmonary surfactant (PS) is one of the main treatment for neonates with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Budesonide has recently been studied as an additional treatment in such cases, but there is limited evidence supporting this. This study was implemented to determine the efficacy of PS combined with budesonide in premature infants. To achieve this, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials by searching PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception until July 12, 2024. We utilized a random-effects model to calculate the risk ratio and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the clinical outcomes of PS with budesonide versus PS alone. We used the GRADE approach to assess the quality of the evidence. We included 26 randomized controlled trials with a total of 2701 patients in the analysis. Treatments of PS with budesonide and PS alone were compared in all trials. PS with budesonide reduced bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) incidence (risk ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.51, 0.73), duration of mechanical or invasive mechanical ventilation (MD, -2.21 days; 95% CI, -2.72, -1.71), duration requiring oxygen (MD, -5.86 days; 95% CI, -8.44, -3.29), and hospitalization time (MD, -5.61 days; 95% CI, -8.65, -2.56). These results were based on low to very low evidence certainty. Only moderate-to-severe BPD or severe BPD showed a significant reduction when PS was used in conjunction with budesonide, a finding supported by moderate evidence certainty. Our study showed that the administration of PS with budesonide significantly improved respiratory outcomes, including the incidence of BPD, duration of mechanical or invasive mechanical ventilation, duration requiring oxygen, and hospitalization time in preterm infants, without short-term adverse drug events. However, the evidence certainty was mostly low to very low.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.