ArticlePloS one2025
Azithromycin removal from water via adsorption on drinking water sludge-derived materials: Kinetics and isotherms studies.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, we utilized drinking water treatment sludge (WTS) to produce adsorbents through the drying and calcination process. These adsorbents were then evaluated for their ability to remove azithromycin (AZT) from aqueous solutions. The L-500 adsorbent, derived from the calcination (at 500°C) of WTS generated under conditions of low turbidity in the drinking water treatment plant, presented an increase in the specific surface area from 70.745 to 95.471 m2 g-1 and in the total pore volume from 0.154 to 0.211 cm3 g-1, which resulted in a significant AZT removal efficiency of 65% in distilled water after 60 min of treatment. In synthetic wastewater, the rate of AZT removal increased to 80%, in comparison, in a real effluent of a municipal wastewater treatment plant, an AZT removal of 56% was obtained. Kinetic studies revealed that the experimental data followed the pseudo-second-order model (R2: 0.993-0.999, APE: 0.07-1.30%, and Δq: 0.10-2.14%) suggesting that chemisorption is the limiting step in the adsorption using L-500. This finding aligns with FTIR analysis, which indicates that adsorption mechanisms involve π-π stacking, hydrogen bonding, and electrostatic interactions. The equilibrium data were analyzed using the nonlinear Langmuir, Freundlich, and Langmuir-Freundlich isotherms. The Langmuir-Freundlich model presented the best fitting (R2: 0.93, APE: 2.22%, and Δq: 0.06%) revealing numerous interactions and adsorption energies between AZT and L-500. This adsorbent showed a reduction of 19% in its AZT removal after four consecutive reuse cycles. In line with the circular economy principles, our study presents an interesting prospect for the reuse and valorization of WTS. This approach not only offers an effective adsorbent for AZT removal from water but also represents a significant step forward in advancing sustainable water treatment solutions within the framework of the circular economy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.