Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39787029›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of surgery2024

Tumour deposit count is an independent prognostic factor in colorectal cancer-a population-based cohort study.

Simon Lundström, Erik Agger, Marie-Louise Lydrup, Fredrik Jörgren, Pamela Buchwald

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Simon LundströmDepartment of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5602-7128
Erik AggerDepartment of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-4463-2336
Marie-Louise LydrupDepartment of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4803-8548
Fredrik JörgrenDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3876-4033
Pamela BuchwaldDepartment of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6407-5552

Funding

Swedish Cancer SocietySwedish Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTumour deposits are a prognostic factor for overall survival and distant metastasis in lymph node-negative colorectal cancer. However, the current TNM staging system does not account for the presence of tumour deposits in lymph node-positive colorectal cancer, or for the presence of multiple deposits. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic effect of tumour deposit count in patients with colorectal cancer.

methodsPatients who underwent curative surgery for colorectal cancer between 2016 and 2019 were identified nationwide from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. Patients with undisclosed tumour deposit status/count and stage IV disease were excluded. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to assess the prognostic effect of tumour deposit count on overall survival and distant metastasis adjusted for age, sex, neoadjuvant treatment, and number of positive lymph nodes.

resultsOf 18 913 patients assessed, 14 154 patients were analysed with tumour deposits (TDs) present in 1702 (12%) patients. Patients were stratified by tumour deposit count (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and ≥5 TDs). Increased tumour deposit count was associated with decreased 5-year overall survival (79%, 70%, 61%, 66%, 50%, 49%) and increased 5-year risk for distant metastasis (14%, 26%, 35%, 41%, 48%, 54%) respectively. Tumour deposit count remained an independent negative prognostic factor after multivariable Cox regression analysis.

conclusionTumour deposit count is a negative prognostic predictor of both overall survival and distant metastasis in colorectal cancer, independent of positive lymph nodes or neoadjuvant treatment. These findings suggest that tumour deposit count should be integrated into the TNM staging regardless of lymph nodes status to improve prognostic accuracy.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsNeoplasm StagingAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRegistriesSurvival RateSweden

Identifiers

PMID39787029
PMCPMC11683728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.