ArticleThe journal of trauma and acute care surgery2025
Impact of American College of Surgeons trauma verification on statewide collaborative outcomes.
Article in The journal of trauma and acute care surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trauma center level and postoperative mortality: a nationwide cohort study from South Korea.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Annual Homicide Rate as a Proxy for Overall Gun-Related Violent Crime: A Retrospective Study.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAmerican College of Surgeons (ACS) trauma center verification has demonstrated improved outcomes at individual centers, but its impact on statewide Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) Collaboratives is unknown. A statewide TQIP Collaborative, founded in 2011, noted underperformance in six of eight patient cohorts identified in the TQIP Collaborative report. We hypothesized that requiring ACS verification for level I and II trauma centers would result in improved outcomes for the state collaborative.
methodsThe ACS verification requirement was tied to ongoing Trauma Commission funding. Trauma centers were required to apply for an ACS consultative visit by 2017 and were given until 2023 to achieve ACS verification. The effect of this intervention was measured in the number of centers achieving verification and in the performance of the TQIP Collaborative semiannual reports.
resultsIn 2015, only 1 of 15 (7%) trauma centers were ACS verified, and 4 had undergone consultative visits. By 2023, 11 of 12 (92%) trauma centers achieved ACS verification. Following this intervention, the observed-to-expected odds ratio for all-patient morbidity and mortality improved from 1.60 to 1.17, and variation among patient-specific cohorts narrowed from 0.97-1.82 to 0.96-1.48 (Figure 2). Performance in all six underperforming patient-specific cohorts improved over the study period.
conclusionACS verification for level I and II trauma centers improves TQIP Collaborative performance. Statewide Collaboratives should consider ACS verification as a requirement for participation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic and Value-Based Evaluations; Level III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.