ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024
Transcription factor prediction using protein 3D secondary structures.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A transcription factor by any other name - function beyond DNA binding and transactivation.EMBO reports · 2026Review
- The evolutionary foundations of transcriptional regulation in animals.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2025Review
- Organ-level gene-regulatory networks inferred from transcriptomic data reveal context-specific regulation and highlight novel regulators of ripening and ABA-mediated responses in tomato.Plant communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationTranscription factors (TFs) are DNA-binding proteins that regulate gene expression. Traditional methods predict a protein as a TF if the protein contains any DNA-binding domains (DBDs) of known TFs. However, this approach fails to identify a novel TF that does not contain any known DBDs. Recently proposed TF prediction methods do not rely on DBDs. Such methods use features of protein sequences to train a machine learning model, and then use the trained model to predict whether a protein is a TF or not. Because the 3-dimensional (3D) structure of a protein captures more information than its sequence, using 3D protein structures will likely allow for more accurate prediction of novel TFs.
resultsWe propose a deep learning-based TF prediction method (StrucTFactor), which is the first method to utilize 3D secondary structural information of proteins. We compare StrucTFactor with recent state-of-the-art TF prediction methods based on ∼525 000 proteins across 12 datasets, capturing different aspects of data bias (including sequence redundancy) possibly influencing a method's performance. We find that StrucTFactor significantly (P-value < 0.001) outperforms the existing TF prediction methods, improving the performance over its closest competitor by up to 17% based on Matthews correlation coefficient. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Data and source code are available at https://github.com/lieboldj/StrucTFactor and on our website at https://apps.cosy.bio/StrucTFactor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.