Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39786865›Full record

ArticleJMIR perioperative medicine2025

Development and Validation of a Routine Electronic Health Record-Based Delirium Prediction Model for Surgical Patients Without Dementia: Retrospective Case-Control Study.

Emma Holler, Christina Ludema, Zina Ben Miled, Molly Rosenberg, Corey Kalbaugh, Malaz Boustani, Sanjay Mohanty

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR perioperative medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emma HollerDepartment of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4424-925X
Christina LudemaDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0779-810X
Zina Ben MiledDepartment of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Lamar University, Beaumont, TX, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5401-0368
Molly RosenbergDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6679-6791
Corey KalbaughDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7455-0369
Malaz BoustaniDepartment of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0330-677X
Sanjay MohantyDepartment of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0295-3457

Funding

Using Routine Care Electronic Medical Record Data and Artificial Intelligence to Develop a Passive Digital Marker to Predict Postoperative DeliriumK23AG071945 · NIA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI Sanjay Mohanty · 2022 to 2026
$687k
NIA NIH HHS K23 AG071945
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostoperative delirium (POD) is a common complication after major surgery and is associated with poor outcomes in older adults. Early identification of patients at high risk of POD can enable targeted prevention efforts. However, existing POD prediction models require inpatient data collected during the hospital stay, which delays predictions and limits scalability.

objectiveThis study aimed to develop and externally validate a machine learning-based prediction model for POD using routine electronic health record (EHR) data.

methodsWe identified all surgical encounters from 2014 to 2021 for patients aged 50 years and older who underwent an operation requiring general anesthesia, with a length of stay of at least 1 day at 3 Indiana hospitals. Patients with preexisting dementia or mild cognitive impairment were excluded. POD was identified using Confusion Assessment Method records and delirium International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes. Controls without delirium or nurse-documented confusion were matched to cases by age, sex, race, and year of admission. We trained logistic regression, random forest, extreme gradient boosting (XGB), and neural network models to predict POD using 143 features derived from routine EHR data available at the time of hospital admission. Separate models were developed for each hospital using surveillance periods of 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year before admission. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Each model was internally validated using holdout data and externally validated using data from the other 2 hospitals. Calibration was assessed using calibration curves.

resultsThe study cohort included 7167 delirium cases and 7167 matched controls. XGB outperformed all other classifiers. AUROCs were highest for XGB models trained on 12 months of preadmission data. The best-performing XGB model achieved a mean AUROC of 0.79 (SD 0.01) on the holdout set, which decreased to 0.69-0.74 (SD 0.02) when externally validated on data from other hospitals.

conclusionsOur routine EHR-based POD prediction models demonstrated good predictive ability using a limited set of preadmission and surgical variables, though their generalizability was limited. The proposed models could be used as a scalable, automated screening tool to identify patients at high risk of POD at the time of hospital admission.

Indexed as

DeliriumElectronic Health RecordsPostoperative ComplicationsAgedAged, 80 and overCase-Control StudiesDementiaFemaleHumansIndianaMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesRisk Assessmentalgorithmdeliriumelectronic health recordsmachine learningpostoperativepredictionrisk predictionsurgery

Identifiers

PMID39786865
PMCPMC11757977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.