Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39786854›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024

Proteoform identification and quantification based on alignment graphs.

Zhaohui Zhan, Lusheng Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zhaohui ZhanDepartment of Engineering, Shenzhen MSU-BIT University, Shenzhen, 518172, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3044-0552
Lusheng WangDepartment of Computer Science, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 999077, China.

Funding

National Science Foundation 61972329
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationProteoforms are the different forms of a proteins generated from the genome with various sequence variations, splice isoforms, and post-translational modifications. Proteoforms regulate protein structures and functions. A single protein can have multiple proteoforms due to different modification sites. Proteoform identification is to find proteoforms of a given protein that best fits the input spectrum. Proteoform quantification is to find the corresponding abundances of different proteoforms for a specific protein.

resultsWe proposed algorithms for proteoform identification and quantification based on the top-down tandem mass spectrum. In the combination alignments of the HomMTM spectrum and the reference protein, we need to give a correction of the mass for each matched peak within the pre-defined error range. After the correction, we impose that the mass between any two (not necessarily consecutive) matched nodes in the protein is identical to that of the corresponding two matched peaks in the HomMTM spectrum. We design a back-tracking graph to store such kind of information and find a combinatorial path (k paths) with the minimum sum of peak intensity error in this back-tracking graph. The obtained alignment can also show the relative abundance of these proteoforms (paths). Our experimental results demonstrate the algorithm's capability to identify and quantify proteoform combinations encompassing a greater number of peaks. This advancement holds promise for enhancing the accuracy and comprehensiveness of proteoform quantification, addressing a crucial need in the field of top-down MS-based proteomics. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The software package are available at https://github.com/Zeirdo/TopMGQuant.

Indexed as

ProteinsProteomicsSequence AlignmentAlgorithmsProtein IsoformsSequence Analysis, ProteinSoftwareProtein IsoformsProteins

Identifiers

PMID39786854
PMCPMC11769674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.