ArticleBehavioral neuroscience2025
A matter of complexity? The role of the dorsal posterior parietal cortex in processing changes in spatial information across time.
Article in Behavioral neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The 3D Vertical Maze: A new model system for studying the interactions between social and spatial cognition.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The posterior parietal cortex (PPC) is an associative neocortical region that integrates multiple streams of information and is implicated in spatial cognition and decision making. In some cases, however, the PPC is not required for these functions. One possibility is that the PPC is recruited when spatial complexity is high. Yet, few studies of PPC function have explicitly manipulated environmental complexity, complexity of spatial changes, or the temporal structure of spatial tasks. To examine whether task complexity recruits PPC function, we tested rats with neurotoxic damage to the dorsal PPC on a series of tasks varying in spatial and temporal complexity. Recognition memory was first assessed in standard exploration tasks, including object recognition, object location, and object in place, as well as a more complex object task in which spatial changes occurred across multiple delays. Spatial navigation was assessed in the circular hole board maze (Barnes maze), and temporal processing was assessed in a temporal order task. PPC damage spared performance on standard recognition memory tasks but caused deficits on tasks involving changes in object configuration or multiple changes across time. PPC damage spared acquisition on the Barnes maze but impaired retention and decreased efficiency of search strategies. PPC damage did not impact temporal order memory. Overall, these results suggest that the PPC is necessary when spatial complexity of the task increases attentional and long-term memory demands. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.