Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39786766›Full record

ArticleJAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery2025

Cochlear Implant Electrode Placement and Music Perception.

Katelyn A Berg, Jack H Noble, Benoit M Dawant, Linsey W Sunderhaus, Andrea J DeFreese, Robert F Labadie, René H Gifford

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Characterizing Music Engagement and Reward in Individuals Across a Spectrum of Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Electrode Placement Factors and Their Impact on Spectral Resolution in Pediatric and Adult Cochlear Implant Users.Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Katelyn A BergDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Jack H NobleDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Benoit M DawantDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Linsey W SunderhausDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Andrea J DeFreeseDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Robert F LabadieDepartment of Otolaryngology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.
René H GiffordDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.

Funding

Overall: Eunice Kennedy Shriver Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center at VanderbiltP50HD103537 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Lea K Davis · 2020 to 2026
$10.3M
Optimizing cochlear implants for music perceptionF32DC020347 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BERG, KATELYN · 2022 to 2024
$218k
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103537NIDCD NIH HHS F32 DC020347
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Cochlear implants enable improvements in speech perception, but music perception outcomes remain variable. Image-guided cochlear implant programming has emerged as a potential programming strategy for increasing the quality of spectral information delivered through the cochlear implant to improve outcomes. Objectives: To perform 2 experiments, the first of which modeled the variance in music perception scores as a function of electrode positioning factors, and the second of which evaluated image-guided cochlear implant programming as a strategy to improve music perception with a cochlear implant. Design, Setting, and Participants: This single-center, prospective study recruited 50 adult patients with at least 6 months of cochlear implant listening experience and normal cochlear anatomy to participate in experiment 1 from 2013 to 2023. Data analysis was conducted from January to February 2024. Thirty-four of the 50 patients from experiment 1 also completed experiment 2. Interventions: Cochlear implant programming using a computed tomography-guided electrode selection strategy. Main Outcomes and Measures: University of Washington Clinical Assessment of Music score, including subtests of pitch discrimination thresholds, isochronous familiar melody recognition, and timbre recognition. Results: Of 50 participants, 20 (40%) were female, and the mean (SD) age was 57.7 (16.4) years. Experiment 1 suggested that better music perception abilities in the 50 participants were associated with patients who were younger and had a postlingual onset of deafness, as well as electrode arrays with a full scala tympani insertion, higher modiolar distance, and shallower insertion depth. Experiment 2 suggested improvements in melody recognition in the 34 participants using the image-guided cochlear implant programming strategy. Patients with apical electrodes that were deactivated were more likely to demonstrate an improvement in their pitch perception thresholds with the image-guided strategy, likely due to the low-frequency stimuli used in the University of Washington Clinical Assessment of Music. Conclusions and Relevance: This study identified patient and device factors that were associated with music perception outcomes with a cochlear implant. These findings suggest that a personalized, image-guided approach to programming may improve music perception abilities for patients with cochlear implants.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionCochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsMusicAdultAgedElectrodes, ImplantedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSpeech PerceptionTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID39786766
PMCPMC11907309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.