Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39786740›Full record

ArticleJAMA2025

Changes in Patient Care Experience After Private Equity Acquisition of US Hospitals.

Anjali Bhatla, Victoria L Bartlett, Michael Liu, ZhaoNian Zheng, Rishi K Wadhera

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Implications of Private Equity Investment in Emergency Medicine.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. The Financialization of Healthcare in France: Trends and implications.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anjali BhatlaRichard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Victoria L BartlettRichard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Michael LiuRichard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
ZhaoNian ZhengRichard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Rishi K WadheraRichard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Private equity acquisitions of health care facilities have rapidly increased over the past decade. However, little is known about the effects of private equity acquisitions of US hospitals on patient care experience. Objective: To evaluate whether the acquisition of hospitals by private equity firms was associated with changes in measures of patient-reported experience compared with matched control hospitals from 2008 through 2019. Design, Settings, and Participants: This cohort study identified 73 US hospitals newly acquired by private equity firms and 293 matched control (nonacquired) US hospitals from 2008 through 2019. An event study, difference-in-differences design was used to evaluate changes in patient experiences measures from 3 years before to 3 years after private equity acquisition. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were 2 global measures of patient-reported care experience from the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey, which included patients' overall hospital rating and willingness to recommend the hospital. Secondary outcomes included the 7 other HCAHPS measures encompassing clinical process, communication, and environmental measures. Results: There were 73 private equity-acquired hospitals and 293 matched control hospitals. The percentage of patients rating hospitals as a 9 or 10, on a scale of 0 to 10, decreased at private equity-acquired hospitals (65.0% before acquisition and 65.2% after acquisition) when compared with control hospitals (66.2% to 69.2%) during the postacquisition period relative to the preacquisition period with a difference-in-differences estimate of -2.4 percentage points (95% CI, -3.9 to -0.9). In addition, the percentage of patients who would definitely recommend the hospital also decreased at private equity-acquired hospitals (66.9% before acquisition and 65.5% after acquisition) compared with control hospitals (68.2% to 69.3%) with a difference-in-difference estimate of -2.1 percentage points (95% CI, -3.6 to -0.7). For both of these global measures of patient experience, the difference between private equity-acquired and control hospitals increased over time and was largest in year 3 after acquisition (-5.2 percentage points [95% CI, -8.8 to -1.5] and -4.4 percentage points [95% CI, -8.0 to -0.70] for each measure, respectively). For secondary measures of patient care experience, there was a decrease in patient-reported responsiveness of hospital staff at private equity-acquired hospitals compared with control hospitals (-1.3 percentage points [95% CI, -2.4 to -0.2]), but no differential change across other measures of clinical process, communication, and environment. Conclusions and Relevance: Patient care experience worsened after private equity acquisition of hospitals. These findings raise concern about the implications of private equity acquisitions on patient care experience at US hospitals.

Indexed as

Health Facility MergerHospitalsHospitals, PrivatePatient SatisfactionQuality of Health CareCohort StudiesHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID39786740
PMCPMC11815525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.