ArticleJAMA2025
Changes in Patient Care Experience After Private Equity Acquisition of US Hospitals.
Article in JAMA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Private equity ownership and artificial intelligence adoption by hospitals in the United States.Health affairs scholar · 2026Article
- Content Refinement and Multicenter Validation of the ELIGES Patient Experience Questionnaire Focused on Nursing Care During Hospitalization: Study Protocol.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Article
- Private equity acquisitions and cancer care: nothing to see here? Not so fast.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2026Article
- Three facts about private equity in the US hospital sector.Health affairs scholar · 2026Article
- Perspectives on increasing corporate ownership and unionization in hospital medicine: An exploratory mixed methods study.Journal of hospital medicine · 2026Article
- Health care access, affordability, and satisfaction following enrollment in Medicare Advantage.Health affairs scholar · 2026Article
- Private Equity Acquisition in Primary Care and Avoidable Hospitalizations.JAMA health forum · 2026Article
- Return on investment, return of risk: private equity in gastrointestinal cancer care.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- A practitioner's guide to using data on private equity hospital acquisitions.Health affairs scholar · 2026Article
- The Implications of Private Equity Investment in Emergency Medicine.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2026Article
- Private Equity Acquisition and Buprenorphine Prescribing.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Private equity acquisitions of hospitals and the changing landscape of care for patients with gastrointestinal cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Fundamentals of healthcare delivery science for the non-health systems scientist: the final step in translational research for late-life psychiatric and neurocognitive disorders.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026Review
- Interventions to address inequities in infant mortality and morbidity in the NICU and beyond: A focus on the mother-infant dyad.Seminars in perinatology · 2025Review
- Patient healthcare spending after the No Surprises Act: quasi-experimental difference-in-differences study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2025Article
- The Financialization of Healthcare in France: Trends and implications.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Article
- Effect of orthodontic treatment on periodontal health and masticatory function in patients with anterior teeth displacement due to periodontal disease.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Private equity acquisitions of health care facilities have rapidly increased over the past decade. However, little is known about the effects of private equity acquisitions of US hospitals on patient care experience. Objective: To evaluate whether the acquisition of hospitals by private equity firms was associated with changes in measures of patient-reported experience compared with matched control hospitals from 2008 through 2019. Design, Settings, and Participants: This cohort study identified 73 US hospitals newly acquired by private equity firms and 293 matched control (nonacquired) US hospitals from 2008 through 2019. An event study, difference-in-differences design was used to evaluate changes in patient experiences measures from 3 years before to 3 years after private equity acquisition. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were 2 global measures of patient-reported care experience from the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey, which included patients' overall hospital rating and willingness to recommend the hospital. Secondary outcomes included the 7 other HCAHPS measures encompassing clinical process, communication, and environmental measures. Results: There were 73 private equity-acquired hospitals and 293 matched control hospitals. The percentage of patients rating hospitals as a 9 or 10, on a scale of 0 to 10, decreased at private equity-acquired hospitals (65.0% before acquisition and 65.2% after acquisition) when compared with control hospitals (66.2% to 69.2%) during the postacquisition period relative to the preacquisition period with a difference-in-differences estimate of -2.4 percentage points (95% CI, -3.9 to -0.9). In addition, the percentage of patients who would definitely recommend the hospital also decreased at private equity-acquired hospitals (66.9% before acquisition and 65.5% after acquisition) compared with control hospitals (68.2% to 69.3%) with a difference-in-difference estimate of -2.1 percentage points (95% CI, -3.6 to -0.7). For both of these global measures of patient experience, the difference between private equity-acquired and control hospitals increased over time and was largest in year 3 after acquisition (-5.2 percentage points [95% CI, -8.8 to -1.5] and -4.4 percentage points [95% CI, -8.0 to -0.70] for each measure, respectively). For secondary measures of patient care experience, there was a decrease in patient-reported responsiveness of hospital staff at private equity-acquired hospitals compared with control hospitals (-1.3 percentage points [95% CI, -2.4 to -0.2]), but no differential change across other measures of clinical process, communication, and environment. Conclusions and Relevance: Patient care experience worsened after private equity acquisition of hospitals. These findings raise concern about the implications of private equity acquisitions on patient care experience at US hospitals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.