ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2025
Conjunctival Bulbar Redness Extraction Pipeline for High-Resolution Ocular Surface Photography.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Smartphone-Based Automated Quantification of Bulbar Conjunctival Hyperemia Using Vessel Density Mapping.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To extract conjunctival bulbar redness from standardized high-resolution ocular surface photographs of a novel imaging system by implementing an image analysis pipeline. Methods: Data from two trials (healthy; outgoing ophthalmic clinic) were collected, processed, and used to train a machine learning model for ocular surface segmentation. Various regions of interest were defined to globally and locally extract a redness biomarker based on color intensity. The image-based redness scores were correlated to clinical gradings (Efron) for validation. Results: The model to determine the regions of interest was verified for a segmentation performance, yielding mean intersections over union of 0.9639 (iris) and 0.9731 (ocular surface). All trial data were analyzed and a digital grading scale for the novel imaging system was established. Photographs and redness scores from visits weeks apart showed good feasibility and reproducibility. For scores within the same session, a mean coefficient of variation of 4.09% was observed. A moderate positive Spearman correlation (0.599) was found with clinical grading. Conclusions: The proposed conjunctival bulbar redness extraction pipeline demonstrates that by using standardized imaging, a segmentation model and image-based redness scores' external eye photography can be classified and evaluated. Therefore, it shows the potential to provide eye care professionals with an objective tool to grade ocular redness and facilitate clinical decision-making in a high-throughput manner. Translational Relevance: To empower clinicians and researchers with a high-throughput workflow by standardized imaging combined with an analysis tool based on artificial intelligence to objectively determine an image-based redness score.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.