ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2025
Pulsed Ultrasound-Mediated Drug Delivery Enhancement Through Human Sclera.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microneedle technology in the treatment of ocular diseases: Advances and applications.Asian journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2026Review
- Advances in ultrasound-assisted drug delivery and clinical application.Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to characterize whether pulsed ultrasound (PUS) affects transscleral drug delivery. Methods: Fluorescein sodium (NaF, 376 Da) and fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated dextran 40 (FD-40, 40 kDa) were used as model drugs. Human sclera grafts were placed in modified Franz diffusion cells and were treated by PUS (1 megahertz [MHz], 0.71 W/cm2, duty cycle 30%, application time 5 minutes) once or repeatedly under various conditions to assess permeation enhancement and reservoir effect. The safety of PUS application was assessed on human sclera grafts ex vivo and rabbit eyes in vivo by histology and temperature measurements. Results: Single PUS application yielded a significant increase in FD-40 permeation (P < 0.05). Repeated PUS applications led to a further enhancement in FD-40 permeation and also significantly promoted NaF permeation (more than 8.51-fold, P < 0.05). The human scleral permeability was temporarily modified by PUS, as evidenced by the increased scleral permeability during PUS application and the unchanged permeability coefficients at steady state. The reservoir effect of human sclera was also enhanced by PUS application. Cavitation was detected under PUS. A minor increase in graft temperature rise (<1°C) and no ocular damage was caused by PUS. Conclusions: PUS is an efficient and safe method to enhance model drugs to transport across human sclera by increasing the scleral permeability transiently and improving the reservoir effect. The enhancement was correlated with the molecule size and further promoted by the repeated PUS application. Translational Relevance: Our study provides proof of concept for using PUS to enhance drug delivery to the posterior eye segment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.