ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2025
Previous maximal transurethral resection of bladder tumor lead to unfavorable perioperative outcomes following radical cystectomy.
Article in International urology and nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the impact of maximal transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) on perioperative outcomes following radical cystectomy (RC).
methodsThis study included 310 patients who underwent RC for the diagnosis of bladder urothelial carcinoma. Of these, 146 patients had a history of maximal TURBT (TURBT group) and 164 did not (non-TURBT group). Patients in the TURBT group were categorized into four groups according to the time interval between the last TURBT and RC: ≤ 1 month, 1-3 months, 3-6 months, and > 6 months. Additionally, the TURBT group was stratified into a single TURBT group and multiple TURBT group. Perioperative outcomes were compared between the groups.
resultsThe median duration of pelvic drainage tube retention was longer in the TURBT group (11 vs. 9 days, p = 0.037). The incidence of Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3 complications (15.3% vs. 7.3%, p = 0.031) and ICU admission rate(10.4% vs. 4.5%, p = 0.048) were higher in the TURBT group. Statistically significant differences were observed in the incidence of Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3 complications (p = 0.007), reoperation rates (p = 0.041), incidence of sepsis (p = 0.022), and urinary complications (p = 0.024) across the four groups stratified by the time interval between TURBT and RC, with the 1-3 to months group demonstrating the highest incidence. There was no significant difference in perioperative outcomes between patients who underwent a single TURBT and those who underwent multiple TURBT.
conclusionPatients with a history of maximal TURBT, especially those who underwent RC within 1-3 months after maximal TURBT, have an increased risk of unfavorable perioperative outcomes following RC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39786703What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.