ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2025
Impact of preoperative stenting in management of bilateral ureteral stones.
Article in International urology and nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to evaluate the impact of preoperative stenting on surgical outcomes and complications in patients with bilateral ureteric stones, specifically assessing its role in reducing the need for subsequent interventions.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted at a tertiary center over eight years, involving 82 patients with bilateral ureteric stones. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (no preoperative stenting) and Group 2 (preoperative stenting). Key data collected included demographics, preoperative stone sizes, preoperative serum creatinine levels, operative details, postoperative complications, and stone-free rates (SFR) at two weeks post-surgery. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 25.0.
resultsOf the 54 patients analyzed (27 in each group), the mean age was 48.8 ± 12.7 for Group 1 and 52.3 ± 15.2 for Group 2. Group 2 exhibited significantly higher preoperative serum creatinine levels (p = 0.016). Secondary interventions were needed for 8 patients in Group 1 versus 3 in Group 2 (p = 0.042). The SFR was 67% in Group 1 and 78% in Group 2 (p = 0.361), indicating no statistically significant difference.
conclusionPreoperative stenting may enhance the success of surgical interventions for bilateral ureteric stones, potentially reducing the need for further procedures. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these findings and optimize management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39786702What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.