Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39786688›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of epidemiology2025

The Dutch Early-Stage Melanoma (D-ESMEL) study: a discovery set and validation cohort to predict the absolute risk of distant metastases in stage I/II cutaneous melanoma.

Catherine Zhou, Antien L Mooyaart, Thamila Kerkour, Marieke W J Louwman, Marlies Wakkee, Yunlei Li, Quirinus J M Voorham, Annette Bruggink, Tamar E C Nijsten, Loes M Hollestein

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Catherine ZhouDepartment of Dermatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-7157-6341
Antien L MooyaartDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Thamila KerkourDepartment of Dermatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Marieke W J LouwmanDepartment of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Marlies WakkeeDepartment of Dermatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Yunlei LiDepartment of Pathology and Clinical Bioinformatics, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Quirinus J M VoorhamDutch Nationwide Pathology Databank (Palga), Houten, The Netherlands.
Annette BrugginkDutch Nationwide Pathology Databank (Palga), Houten, The Netherlands.
Tamar E C NijstenDepartment of Dermatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Loes M HollesteinDepartment of Dermatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. l.hollestein@erasmusmc.nl.

Funding

Health~Holland EMCLSH19008KWF Kankerbestrijding 13470
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early-stage cutaneous melanoma patients generally have a favorable prognosis, yet a significant proportion of metastatic melanoma cases arise from this group, highlighting the need for improved risk stratification using novel prognostic biomarkers. The Dutch Early-Stage Melanoma (D-ESMEL) study introduces a robust, population-based methodology to develop an absolute risk prediction model for stage I/II melanoma, incorporating clinical, imaging, and multi-omics data to identify patients at increased risk for distant metastases. Utilizing the Netherlands Cancer Registry and Dutch Nationwide Pathology Databank, we collected primary tumor samples from early-stage melanoma patients, with and without distant metastases during follow-up. Our study design includes a discovery set of metastatic cases and matched controls to identify novel prognostic factors, followed by a validation cohort using a nested case-control design to validate these factors and to build a risk prediction model. Tissue sections underwent Hematoxylin & Eosin (H&E) staining, RNA sequencing (RNAseq), DNA sequencing (DNAseq), immunohistochemistry (IHC), and multiplex immunofluorescence (MxIF).The discovery set included 442 primary melanoma samples (221 case-control sets), with 46% stage I and 54% stage II melanomas. The median time to distant metastasis was 3.4 years, while controls had a median follow-up time of 9.8 years. The validation cohort included 154 cases and 154 controls from a random population-based selection of 5,815 patients. Our approach enabled the collection of a large number of early-stage melanoma samples from population-based databases with extensive follow-up and a sufficient number of metastatic events. This methodology in prognostic cancer research holds the potential to impact clinical decision-making through absolute risk prediction.

Indexed as

MelanomaSkin NeoplasmsAdultAgedCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm StagingNetherlandsPrognosisRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsBiomarkersMelanomaMulti-omicsPopulation-basedPrognosticRisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID39786688
PMCPMC11799080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.