ArticleArchives of toxicology2025
Dynamics in zebrafish development define transcriptomic specificity after angiogenesis inhibitor exposure.
Article in Archives of toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Analytical choices drive toxicogenomic potency estimates: a systematic evaluation of transcriptomic points of departure.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Testing for developmental toxicity is an integral part of chemical regulations. The applied tests are laborious and costly and require a large number of vertebrate test animals. To reduce animal numbers and associated costs, the zebrafish embryo was proposed as an alternative model. In this study, we investigated the potential of transcriptome analysis in the zebrafish embryo model to support the identification of potential biomarkers for key events in developmental toxicity, using the inhibition of angiogenesis as a proof of principle. Therefore, the effects on the zebrafish transcriptome after exposure to the tyrosine kinase inhibitors, sorafenib (1.3 µM and 2.4 µM) and SU4312 (1 µM, 2 µM, and 5 µM), and the putative vascular disruptor compound rotenone (25 nM and 50 nM) were analyzed. An early (2 hpf-hours post fertilization) and a late (24 hpf) exposure start with a time resolved transcriptome analysis was performed to compare the specificity and sensitivity of the responses with respect to anti-angiogenesis. We also showed that toxicodynamic responses were related to the course of the internal concentrations. To identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) the time series data were compared by applying generalized additive models (GAMs). We observed mainly unspecific developmental toxicity in the early exposure scenario, while a specific repression of vascular related genes was only partially observed. In contrast, differential expression of vascular-related genes could be identified clearly in the late exposure scenario. Rotenone did not show angiogenesis-specific response on a transcriptomic level, indicating that the observed mild phenotype of angiogenesis inhibition may represent a secondary effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.