Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39786586›Full record

ReviewStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2025

Implant-based reconstruction and adjuvant radiotherapy in breast cancer patients-current status and DEGRO recommendations.

M D Piroth, D Krug, R Baumann, V Strnad, K Borm, S Combs, S Corradini, M N Duma, J Dunst, G Fastner and 9 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

M D PirothDepartment of Radiation Oncology, HELIOS University Hospital Wuppertal, Witten/Herdecke University, Heusnerstraße 40, 42283, Wuppertal, Germany. marc.piroth@helios-gesundheit.de.ORCID 0000-0002-6934-4624
D KrugDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
R BaumannDepartment of Radiation Oncology, St. Marien-Krankenhaus, Siegen, Germany.
V StrnadDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
K BormTUM School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
S CombsTUM School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
S CorradiniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
M N DumaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Helios Clinics of Schwerin-University Campus of MSH Medical School Hamburg, Schwerin, Germany.
J DunstDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
G FastnerDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radio-Oncology, University Hospital Salzburg, Landeskrankenhaus, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
P FeyerFormerly Department of Radiation Oncology, Vivantes Hospital Neukölln, Berlin, Germany.
R FietkauDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
W HarmsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, St. Claraspital, Basel, Switzerland.
T HehrDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Marienhospital Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
J Hörner-RieberDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
C MatuschekDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Bielefeld University, Medical School and University Medical Center OWL, Campus Klinikum Mitte, Bielefeld, Germany.
C SchmeelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
W BudachDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Breast Cancer Expert Panel of the German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this review is to give an overview of the results of prospective and retrospective studies using allogenic reconstruction and postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in breast cancer and to make recommendations regarding this interdisciplinary approach. MATERIALS AND

methodsA PubMed search was conducted to extract relevant articles from 2000 to 2024. The search was performed using the following terms: (breast cancer) AND (reconstruction OR implant OR expander) AND (radiotherapy OR radiation). Data from the literature on allogenic breast reconstruction and radiation are presented and discussed in relation to toxicity and cosmesis. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Breast reconstruction is also feasible if PMRT is necessary. Patients need to be informed about the relevant risk of capsular fibrosis and implant failure. A planned reconstruction is no reason to forgo PMRT nor is an indication for PMRT a reason to forego implant-based breast reconstruction if desired by the patient. It is important to provide detailed information here to enable shared decision-making. There is still no clear consensus regarding implant-based reconstruction (IBR) and PMRT. However, in clinical practice, both a one-stage (immediate "implant-direct" IBR) procedure with PMRT up to the final implant and a two-stage (immediate-delayed IBR) procedure with PMRT up to the tissue expander (TE) and later exchange of the TE are used; both approaches have their specific advantages and disadvantages. Depending on patient-specific factors and the surgeon's experience and estimates, both IBR procedures are also possible in combination with PMRT. When using a TE/implant approach, completing skin stretching by adequately filling the expander before PMRT may be favorable. This approach is particularly practical when adjuvant chemotherapy is planned but may lead to postponement of radiotherapy when primary systemic therapy is given. According to the latest data, moderate hypofractionation also appears to be safe in the context of the IBR approach. It is important to have a closely coordinated interdisciplinary approach and to fully inform patients about the increased rate of potential side effects.

Indexed as

Breast ImplantationBreast ImplantsBreast NeoplasmsMammaplastyCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansMastectomyRadiotherapy, AdjuvantRetrospective StudiesBreast cancerBreast reconstructionImplant-based reconstructionMastectomyPostmastectomy radiotherapyRadiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID39786586
PMCPMC11928413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.