Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39786553›Full record

ArticleJournal of economic entomology2025

Recycling honey bee drone brood for sustainable beekeeping.

Ratko Pavlović, Karl Crailsheim, Miloš Petrović, Walter Goessler, Nenad M Zarić

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of economic entomology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ratko PavlovićFaculty of Chemistry, Department of Biochemistry, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Karl CrailsheimDepartment of Biology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Miloš PetrovićFaculty of Agriculture, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.ORCID 0009-0005-8487-7460
Walter GoesslerInstitute of Chemistry, Analytical Chemistry for Health and Environment, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Nenad M ZarićInstitute of Bioanalytics and Agro-Metabolomics, Department of Agrobiotechnology IFA-Tulln, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna (BOKU), Tulln, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-5419-8460

Funding

Austrian Science Fund 10.55776/ESP428Ministry of Science, Technological Development and Innovation 337-00-577/2021-09/19OeAD RS 17/2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pollination by insects is vital for global agriculture, with honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) being the most important pollinators. Honey bees are exposed to numerous stressors, including disease, pesticides, and inadequate nutrition, resulting in significant colony losses. This study investigates the use of drone brood to mitigate these problems. Drone brood, which is normally discarded during varroa mite (Varroa destructor, Anderson and Trueman) management, is rich in proteins, fats, and essential minerals. We compared drone brood with an already suggested pollen supplement (Tenebrio [Tenebrio molitor L.] flour). The results indicate that drone brood flour is a viable source of proteins, fats, and minerals and is potentially antimicrobial due to its high content of elements with known antimicrobial properties. It meets the nutritional needs of honey bees while mitigating the effects of varroa mites. The use of drone brood flour can provide high-quality beeswax, surplus of pollen, and improve bee health, which promotes sustainable beekeeping.

Indexed as

BeekeepingRecyclingAnimalsBeesPollenVarroidaehoney beemitenutritionVarroayellow mealworm

Identifiers

PMID39786553
PMCPMC11818385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.