ArticleMolecular human reproduction2025
Animal and vegetal materials of mouse oocytes segregate at first zygotic cleavage: a simple mechanism that makes the two-cell blastomeres differ reciprocally from the start.
Article in Molecular human reproduction, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- High-sensitivity in situ detection of Sox21 reveals transcript asymmetry from the zygote stage.Developmental biology · 2026Article
- Variable partition of non-homogeneous ooplasm sets the stage for divergent potency of 2-cell stage blastomeres.Molecular human reproduction · 2026Article
- Production of live monkeys and their genetically matched embryonic stem cells from single embryos.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent advances in embryology have shown that the sister blastomeres of two-cell mouse and human embryos differ reciprocally in potency. An open question is whether the blastomeres became different as opposed to originating as different. Here we wanted to test two relevant but conflicting models: one proposing that each blastomere contains both animal and vegetal materials in balanced proportions because the plane of first cleavage runs close to the animal-vegetal axis of the fertilized oocyte (meridional cleavage); and the other model proposing that each blastomere contains variable proportions of animal and vegetal materials because the plane of the first cleavage can vary - up to an equatorial orientation - depending on the topology of fertilization. Therefore, we imposed the fertilization site in three distinct regions of mouse oocytes (animal pole, vegetal pole, equator) via ICSI. After the first zygotic cleavage, the sister blastomeres were dissociated and subjected to single-cell transcriptome analysis, keeping track of the original pair associations. Non-supervised hierarchical clustering revealed that the frequency of correct pair matches varied with the fertilization site (vegetal pole > animal pole > equator), thereby, challenging the first model of balanced partitioning. However, the inter-blastomere differences had similar signatures of gene ontology across the three groups, thereby, also challenging the competing model of variable partitioning. These conflicting observations could be reconciled if animal and vegetal materials were partitioned at the first cleavage: an event considered improbable and possibly deleterious in mammals. We tested this occurrence by keeping the fertilized oocytes immobilized from the time of ICSI until the first cleavage. Image analysis revealed that cleavage took place preferentially along the short (i.e. equatorial) diameter of the oocyte, thereby partitioning the animal and vegetal materials into the two-cell blastomeres. Our results point to a simple mechanism by which the two sister blastomeres start out as different, rather than becoming different.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.