ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2025
Could cleaved embryo morphology and morphokinetics be associated with prenatal and neonatal outcomes?
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate if morphology and morphokinetics of cleaved embryos affect prenatal and perinatal outcomes.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study included 734 single fresh embryo transfer (SET) from ICSI from January 2014 to December 2020 at the Dijon University Hospital. Using time-lapse technology, embryos were defined as TOP or non-TOP according to morphological/morphokinetic criteria. Linear regression, adjusted for maternal factors, explored the association between cleaved-embryo quality and implantation rate, miscarriage rate, live birth rate, term, birthweight, and birthweight Z-score.
resultsMultivariate analyses showed that non-implanted embryos were significantly more often out of the interquartile range than implanted embryos for cell events t2 (p = 0.019), t3 (p = 0.038), t4 (p = 0.013), ECC1 (p = 0.047), and ECC2 (p = 0.001). After implantation, the morphokinetics was significantly different for non-TOP embryos ending in miscarriage or live birth. A significant high risk of miscarriage was found for embryos with a short or long ECC1 (3.27 [95% CI: 1.44;8.37]. There was no significant difference in birthweight, birthweight Z-score, or term between TOP and non-TOP embryos. An association with increased birthweight was observed in multivariate analysis for pronuclei appearance (tPNa) (p = 0.001out of the range. Late tPNa was associated with a higher birthweight Z-score (p < 0.0001) while late pronuclei disappearance (tPNf) was associated with a lower Z-score (p = 0.006).
conclusionMorphological and morphokinetic parameters significantly influence implantation rates and the likelihood of a live birth from embryos with non-optimal morphological features. Birthweight Z-scores were significantly higher with late tPNa and lower with late tPNf.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.