ArticleMolecular diversity2025
Integrating machine learning and structural dynamics to explore B-cell lymphoma-2 inhibitors for chronic lymphocytic leukemia therapy.
Article in Molecular diversity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computational characterization and machine learning analysis of quantum optimized marine fungal metabolites targeting PD-L1 in cancer immunotherapy.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2025Article
- Inhibition of human N myristoyltransferase 1 as a strategy to suppress cancer progression driven by myristoylation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a malignancy caused by the overexpression of the anti-apoptotic protein B-cell lymphoma-2 (BCL-2), making it a critical therapeutic target. This study integrates computational screening, molecular docking, and molecular dynamics to identify and validate novel BCL-2 inhibitors from the ChEMBL database. Starting with 836 BCL-2 inhibitors, we performed ADME and Lipinski's Rule of Five (RO5) filtering, clustering, maximum common substructure (MCS) analysis, and machine learning models (Random Forest, SVM, and ANN), yielding a refined set of 124 compounds. Among these, 13 compounds within the most common substructure (MCS1) cluster showed promising features and were prioritized. A docking-based re-evaluation highlighted four lead compounds-ChEMBL464268, ChEMBL480009, ChEMBL464440, and ChEMBL518858-exhibiting notable binding affinities. Although a reference molecule outperformed in docking, molecular dynamics (MD), and binding energy analyses, it failed ADME and Lipinski criteria, unlike the selected leads. Further validation through MD simulations and MM/GBSA energy calculations confirmed stable binding interactions for the leads, with ChEMBL464268 showing the highest stability and binding affinity (ΔGtotal = - 80.35 ± 11.51 kcal/mol). Free energy landscape (FEL) analysis revealed stable energy minima for these complexes, underscoring conformational stability. Despite moderate activity (pIC₅₀ values from 4.3 to 5.82), the favorable pharmacokinetic profiles of these compounds position them as promising BCL-2 inhibitor leads, with ChEMBL464268 emerging as the most promising candidate for further CLL therapeutic development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39786521What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.