ArticleEuropean radiology2025
Are we systematically overdosing women? Revisiting standardized contrast protocols for thoracoabdominal CT scans.
Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Increasing pulmonary artery visibility and diagnostic confidence with ultra-high resolution photon-counting detector CT pulmonary angiography.European radiology · 2026Article
- Risk factor analysis of iodinated contrast medium-related hypersensitivity reactions.Insights into imaging · 2025Review
- Comparison Between Weight-Based Variable-Voltage and Fixed Volume-Voltage Protocols in Cancer Surveillance Computed Tomography.Journal of computer assisted tomographyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the iodine contrast in blood and solid organs differs between men and women and to evaluate the effect of BMI, height, weight, and blood volume (BV) on sex-specific contrast in staging CT. MATERIALS AND
methodsPatients receiving a venous-phase thoracoabdominal Photon-Counting Detector CT (PCD-CT) scan with 100- or 120-mL CM between 08/2021 and 01/2022 were retrospectively included in this single-center study. Image analysis was performed by measuring iodine contrast in the liver, portal vein, spleen, left atrium, left ventricle, pulmonary trunk, ascending and descending aorta on spectral PCD-CT datasets. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to assess the impact of sex, age, BMI, height, weight, and BV on the iodine contrast.
resultsA total of 274 patients were included (mean age 68 years ± 12 SD, 168 men). Iodine contrast in organs and blood attenuation was significantly higher in women when using the same volume of CM. Sex, age, BMI, height, weight, and BV significantly influenced iodine contrast. After adjusting for confounding variables, sex remained a significant factor, with women having higher parenchymal and vascular iodine contrast.
conclusionStandardized or weight-adapted use of CM in venous-phase thoracoabdominal CT scans results in significantly higher contrast in women compared to men. Customizing the CM dose to the patient's BV could result in a similar contrast between sexes. This approach has the potential to reduce the amount of CM, resulting in cost savings, and to decrease the risks associated with CM, particularly for the female sex. KEY POINTS: Question This study addresses whether current standardized iodinated contrast media protocols lead to systematically higher iodine enhancement in women than in men during thoracoabdominal CT. Findings Women consistently show greater iodine enhancement in blood and abdominal organs compared to BMI-matched men when receiving identical volumes of contrast media. Clinical relevance Adjusting contrast media dosage based on blood volume in venous-phase CT scans could equalize parenchymal and intravascular iodine enhancement across sexes. This approach may reduce unnecessary contrast exposure in women, lower associated risks, and optimize healthcare resource allocation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.