Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39786481›Full record

ArticleDrug safety2025

Leveraging Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning Methods for Adverse Drug Event Detection in Electronic Health/Medical Records: A Scoping Review.

Su Golder, Dongfang Xu, Karen O'Connor, Yunwen Wang, Mahak Batra, Graciela Gonzalez Hernandez

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Drug safety, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Rising Role of Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Pharmacometrics and Model-Informed Precision Dosing in Pediatrics.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Su GolderDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK. su.golder@york.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-8987-5211
Dongfang XuDepartment of Computational Biomedicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Karen O'ConnorDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Yunwen WangWilliam Allen White School of Journalism and Mass Communications, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA.
Mahak BatraDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Graciela Gonzalez HernandezDepartment of Computational Biomedicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

Social Media Mining for PharmacovigilanceR01LM011176 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GONZALEZ HERNANDEZ, GRACIELA, SHEN, LI · 2012 to 2021
$4.5M
NLM NIH HHS R01 LM011176U.S. National Library of Medicine R01LM011176
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNatural language processing (NLP) and machine learning (ML) techniques may help harness unstructured free-text electronic health record (EHR) data to detect adverse drug events (ADEs) and thus improve pharmacovigilance. However, evidence of their real-world effectiveness remains unclear.

objectiveTo summarise the evidence on the effectiveness of NLP/ML in detecting ADEs from unstructured EHR data and ultimately improve pharmacovigilance in comparison to other data sources.

methodsA scoping review was conducted by searching six databases in July 2023. Studies leveraging NLP/ML to identify ADEs from EHR were included. Titles/abstracts were screened by two independent researchers as were full-text articles. Data extraction was conducted by one researcher and checked by another. A narrative synthesis summarises the research techniques, ADEs analysed, model performance and pharmacovigilance impacts.

resultsSeven studies met the inclusion criteria covering a wide range of ADEs and medications. The utilisation of rule-based NLP, statistical models, and deep learning approaches was observed. Natural language processing/ML techniques with unstructured data improved the detection of under-reported adverse events and safety signals. However, substantial variability was noted in the techniques and evaluation methods employed across the different studies and limitations exist in integrating the findings into practice.

conclusionsNatural language processing (NLP) and machine learning (ML) have promising possibilities in extracting valuable insights with regard to pharmacovigilance from unstructured EHR data. These approaches have demonstrated proficiency in identifying specific adverse events and uncovering previously unknown safety signals that would not have been apparent through structured data alone. Nevertheless, challenges such as the absence of standardised methodologies and validation criteria obstruct the widespread adoption of NLP/ML for pharmacovigilance leveraging of unstructured EHR data.

Indexed as

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsElectronic Health RecordsMachine LearningNatural Language ProcessingHumansPharmacovigilance

Identifiers

PMID39786481
PMCPMC11903561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.