Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39786468›Full record

ArticleCVIR endovascular2025

Lymphatic leaks - success of intranodal lymphangiogram first strategy.

Alan Campbell, Diana Velazquez-Pimentel, Matthew Seager, Richard Hesketh, Julian Hague, Jowad Raja, Jocelyn Brookes, An Ngo, Miles Walkden, Anthie Papadopoulou and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CVIR endovascular, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Thigh lymphocutaneous fistula in a child.Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Alan CampbellUniversity College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Diana Velazquez-PimentelBarts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Matthew SeagerKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Richard HeskethRoyal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Julian HagueUniversity College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Jowad RajaUniversity College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Jocelyn BrookesUniversity College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
An NgoUniversity College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Miles WalkdenUniversity College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Anthie PapadopoulouRoyal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Daron SmithUniversity College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Borzoueh MohammadiUniversity College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Ravi BarodRoyal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Mohammed Rashid AkhtarBarts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Jimmy Kyaw TunBarts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Deborah Elise LowBarts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Ian Daniel RenfrewBarts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Tim FotheringhamBarts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Conrad von StempelUniversity College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. conrad.vonstempel@nhs.net.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLymphatic leaks are associated with significant mortality and morbidity. Intranodal lymphangiography (ILAG) involves the direct injection of ethiodised lipid into the hilum of lymph nodes. It is diagnostic procedure that can have therapeutic effects secondary to a local sclerosant effect. The aim of the study is to describe the technical and clinical success of ILAG and adjunctive lymphatic interventions performed as first line interventional techniques for lymphatic leaks refractory to conservative and medical management in a multicentre cohort of patients with symptomatic large volume lymphatic leaks.

methodsMulticentre retrospective study of all lymphatic interventions performed between 2017-2023 in patients with large volume lymphatic leaks (> 500 ml a day). Intranodal lymphangiography was performed initially with technical success defined as opacification of the lymphatics at the aortic bifurcation and demonstration of lymphatic leak on the index ILAG procedure or immediate post procedural CT was recorded. Lymphatic embolisation was performed with a combination of direct puncture or transvenous cannulation with glue and or coil embolisation of the thoracic duct or leak point and in cases with refractory leak. Clinical success was defined as reduction in drain output to less than 20 mL per 24 h, or no further insensible lymph leak. Time to clinical success after ILAG and adjunctive embolisation was recorded.

resultsILAG alone lead to clinical success in 14 of 32 (44%) patients after a median of 14 days. Subsequent embolisation was performed in 12 refractory cases; this was successful in 8 (67%) at median of 8 days. Overall clinical success of all lymphatic interventions was 69% (22 of 32 patients) at a median of 11 days (IQR 5-34). No statistically significant correlation between the site of leakage, aetiology or embolisation technique correlated with clinical success. Decision to proceed to repeat ILAG or an adjunct procedure was made on a clinical basis, following multidisciplinary discussion.

conclusionsILAG can be employed a first line interventional therapeutic technique to treat clinically significant lymphatic leaks that are refractory to conservative and medical management. Adjunctive procedures, including embolisation, can be considered as part of clinical decision making after a period of 1-2 weeks' watchful waiting in continuingly refractory cases.

Indexed as

ChyleLymphangiogramLymphatic

Identifiers

PMID39786468
PMCPMC11718034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.