ArticleActa neurochirurgica2025
Intra-individual comparison of long-term outcomes between combined and indirect bypass surgery in adult moyamoya disease.
Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeBypass surgery is regarded as the standard treatment option for symptomatic and hemodynamically unstable moyamoya disease (MMD). However, there is ongoing debate about the most effective type of bypass surgery. We aimed to analyze the long-term outcomes of combined and indirect bypasses for MMD patients through intra-individual comparisons.
methodsOf the 896 patients who underwent 1084 bypass surgeries between 2007 and 2021, 24 patients with MMD who underwent combined bypass on one side and indirect bypass on the other side were ultimately enrolled in this study. Clinical, angiographic and hemodynamic outcomes were retrospectively evaluated.
resultsThree asymptomatic strokes (12.5%) occurred within 30 postoperative days in each group. Postoperative strokes after 30 days occurred in 3 patients (12.5%) with 3 hemorrhagic events and 1 cerebral infarction, only in indirect bypass, while no stroke occurred in hemispheres treated with combined bypass. The revascularization area relative to supratentorial area was significantly greater in combined bypass than in indirect bypass, both in short-term and long-term periods (64.9% versus 43.9% in short-term and 75.7% versus 54.9% in long-term; P < .001, respectively). Hemodynamic outcomes showed significantly greater increases in acetazolamide-challenged cerebral blood flow (CBF
conclusionCombined bypass may be a more effective treatment option for MMD based on its higher revascularization area and favorable hemodynamic results compared to indirect bypass in the same patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.