Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39786428›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024

SampleExplorer: using language models to discover relevant transcriptome data.

Wee Loong Chin, Timo Lassmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Wee Loong ChinNational Centre for Asbestos Related Diseases, QEII Medical Centre, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2549-3601
Timo LassmannThe Kids Research Institute Australia, North Entrance, Perth Children's Hospital, 15 Hospital Ave, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0138-2691

Funding

Stan Perron Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationOver the last two decades, transcriptomics has become a standard technique in biomedical research. We now have large databases of RNA-seq data, accompanied by valuable metadata detailing scientific objectives and the experimental procedures used. The metadata is crucial in understanding and replicating published studies, but so far has been underutilized in helping researchers to discover existing datasets.

resultsWe present SampleExplorer, a tool allowing researchers to search for relevant data using both text and gene set queries. SampleExplorer embeds sample metadata and uses a transformer-based language model to retrieve similar datasets. Extensive benchmarking (see Supplementary Materials and Methods) using the ARCHS4 database demonstrates that SampleExplorer provides an effective approach for retrieving biologically relevant samples from large-scale transcriptomicdata. This tool provides an efficient approach for discovering relevant gene expression datasets in large public repositories. It improves sample and dataset identification across diverse experimental contexts, helping researchers leverage existing transcriptomic data for potential replication or verification studies. Availability and implementation: SampleExplorer is available as a Python package compatible with versions 3.9 to 3.11, available for installation via the Python Package Index (PyPI). The codebase and documentation are accessible at https://github.com/wlchin/SampleExplorer. Supplementary data (Supplementary Materials and Methods) provides detailed methodological information, including an algorithmic description of the retrieval process and data preparation steps.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingSoftwareTranscriptomeComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticHumansMetadataProgramming Languages

Identifiers

PMID39786428
PMCPMC11751629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.