Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39786377›Full record

ArticleJournal of behavioral addictions2025

Feels good, and less bad: Problematic use of the Internet is associated with heightened experiences of both gratification and compensation.

Elisa Wegmann, Stephanie Antons, Lasse David Schmidt, Lena Klein, Christian Montag, Hans-Jürgen Rumpf, Silke M Müller, Matthias Brand

Abstract readClinical StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of behavioral addictions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Elisa Wegmann1General Psychology: Cognition, Faculty of Computer Science, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9373-979X
Stephanie Antons2Center for Behavioral Addiction Research (CeBAR), Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3187-968X
Lasse David Schmidt4Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3865-3114
Lena Klein1General Psychology: Cognition, Faculty of Computer Science, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany.ORCID 0009-0006-3565-599X
Christian Montag5Department of Molecular Psychology, Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8112-0837
Hans-Jürgen Rumpf4Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6848-920X
Silke M Müller1General Psychology: Cognition, Faculty of Computer Science, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6627-2661
Matthias Brand1General Psychology: Cognition, Faculty of Computer Science, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4831-9542

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: During the development of addictive behaviors, theoretical models assume a shift from experience of gratification being a driver in early stages to experience of compensation which dominates at later stages of addiction development. Initial studies show a trend in this direction; however, this shift has not yet been investigated in clinical samples. We assume experienced gratification to be highest in individuals with risky use (indicating the beginning of the addiction process), and compensation to be highest in individuals with pathological use. Methods: Data from 834 participants from a multi-center study (FOR2974) investigating specific Internet-use disorders (IUDs) including gaming, buying-shopping, pornography use, and social-network use disorders were analyzed about Experience of Gratification (EGS) and Experience of Compensation (ECS), symptom severity, use expectancies, and usage motives. A diagnostic interview based on DSM-5 criteria for gaming disorder was used to classify individuals into either non-problematic, risky, or pathological use group. Results: The groups (non-problematic, risky, pathological) differed significantly regarding EGS and ECS. Individuals with pathological use reported highest experiences of compensation but equally high experienced gratification as individuals with risky use. Effects vary with respect to the specific behavior. All measures correlated significantly. Symptom severity was most strongly associated with facets of compensation. Conclusion: The experience of gratification and compensation appear to be crucial for addiction-like Internet use. Experienced gratification is already high in individuals experiencing first negative consequences and appear to be stable in individuals with pathological use indicating the relevance of both positive and negative reinforcement during the addiction processes.

Indexed as

Behavior, AddictiveInternetInternet Addiction DisorderMotivationRewardAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk-TakingYoung Adultbehavioral addictionsgaming disorderInternet addictionInternet-use disordernegative reinforcementpositive reinforcement

Identifiers

PMID39786377
PMCPMC11974442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.