Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39786203›Full record

ArticleActa orthopaedica2025

Automated diagnosis and classification of metacarpal and phalangeal fractures using a convolutional neural network: a retrospective data analysis study.

Michael Axenhus, Anna Wallin, Jonas Havela, Sara Severin, Ablikim Karahan, Max Gordon, Martin Magnéli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta orthopaedica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michael AxenhusDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm; Department of Clinical Sciences at Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. michael.axenhus@ki.se.ORCID 0000-0002-2476-4465
Anna WallinDepartment of Clinical Sciences at Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jonas HavelaDepartment of Clinical Sciences at Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sara SeverinDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm; Department of Clinical Sciences at Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ablikim KarahanDepartment of Clinical Sciences at Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Max GordonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm; Department of Clinical Sciences at Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Martin MagnéliDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm; 2 Department of Clinical Sciences at Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeHand fractures are commonly presented in emergency departments, yet diagnostic errors persist, leading to potential complications. The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in fracture detection has shown promise, but research focusing on hand metacarpal and phalangeal fractures remains limited. We aimed to train and evaluate a convolutional neural network (CNN) model to diagnose metacarpal and phalangeal fractures using plain radiographs according to the AO/OTA classification system and custom classifiers.

methodsA retrospective analysis of 7,515 examinations comprising 27,965 images was conducted, with datasets divided into training, validation, and test datasets. A CNN architecture was based on ResNet and implemented using PyTorch, with the integration of data augmentation techniques.

resultsThe CNN model achieved a mean weighted AUC of 0.84 for hand fractures, with 86% sensitivity and 76% specificity. The model performed best in diagnosing transverse metacarpal fractures, AUC = 0.91, 100% sensitivity, 87% specificity, and tuft phalangeal fractures, AUC = 0.97, 100% sensitivity, 96% specificity. Performance was lower for complex patterns like oblique phalangeal fractures, AUC = 0.76.

conclusionOur study demonstrated that a CNN model can effectively diagnose and classify metacarpal and phalangeal fractures using plain radiographs, achieving a mean weighted AUC of 0.84. 7 categories were deemed as acceptable, 9 categories as excellent, and 3 categories as outstanding. Our findings indicate that a CNN model may be used in the classification of hand fractures.

Indexed as

Finger PhalangesFractures, BoneMetacarpal BonesNeural Networks, ComputerHumansRadiographyRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID39786203
PMCPMC11714779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.