ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2025
Ultrasensitive Detection and Monitoring of Circulating Tumor DNA Using Structural Variants in Early-Stage Breast Cancer.
Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Circulating Tumor DNA and Circulating Tumor Cells in Liquid Biopsy as Post-Treatment Prognostic Biomarkers in Early Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Pooled it
- Accuracy of ctDNA-based minimal residual disease detection in predicting postoperative recurrence of breast cancer: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Non-invasive screening in hereditary cancer: a randomized controlled trial to test cell-free DNA-based early detection in the CHARM consortium.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Trial
- The right patient, the right moment, the right therapy: reimagining precision oncology from the bedside.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2026Review
- Right-sizing treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer: evolving algorithms across the disease continuum.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Evaluation of a Tumor-Informed Molecular Residual Disease Assay in Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy, With or Without Atezolizumab.JCO precision oncology · 2026Article
- Assessing the utility of ctDNA as a prognostic marker in advanced ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Plasticity of Non-Apoptotic Residual Tumor Cells After Neoadjuvant Immunochemotherapy: Epigenetic and Microenvironmental Determinants.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- NeoCircle: pre- and post-operative circulating tumor DNA dynamics predicts survival in neoadjuvant-treated early breast cancer.EMBO molecular medicine · 2026Article
- Personalized whole-genome-based ctDNA dynamics during neoadjuvant therapy across breast cancer subtypes: results from MONITOR-Breast.Future oncology (London, England) · 2026Observational
- Article
- Dual ctDNA and CTCs analysis for minimal residual disease detection and relapse monitoring in early-stage breast cancer.NPJ breast cancer · 2026Article
- ctDNA monitoring using tumor-informed copy number analysis.EMBO molecular medicine · 2026Article
- Tracking response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy through circulating tumor DNA analysis in breast cancer.NPJ breast cancer · 2026Article
- Clinical validation of a tissue-agnostic genome-wide methylome enrichment assay to monitor response to pembrolizumab.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- Molecular residual disease assessment in colorectal and bladder cancer by somatic structural variant analysis of cell-free DNA whole-genome sequencing data.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Circulating tumor DNA in neoadjuvant therapy for solid tumors.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- LncRNA LEF1-AS1 exerts a carcinogenic effect in breast cancer by accelerating proliferation, metastasis, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition.Hereditas · 2025Article
- From residual risk to precision intervention: the evolving role of minimal residual disease in breast cancer management.Cancer biology & medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe detection of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) after curative-intent therapy in early-stage breast cancer is highly prognostic of disease recurrence. Current ctDNA assays, mainly targeting single-nucleotide variants, vary in sensitivity and specificity. Although increasing the number of single-nucleotide variants in tumor-informed assays improves sensitivity, structural variants (SV) may achieve similar or better sensitivity without compromising specificity. SVs occur across all cancers, linked to genomic instability and tumorigenesis, with unique tumor- and patient-specific breakpoints occurring throughout the genome. SVs in breast cancer are underexplored, and their potential for ctDNA detection and monitoring has not been fully evaluated. EXPERIMENTAL
designWe retrospectively analyzed a tumor-informed SV-based ctDNA assay in a cohort of patients with early-stage breast cancer (n = 100, 568 timepoints) receiving neoadjuvant systemic therapy, evaluating ctDNA dynamics and lead times to clinical recurrence in the postoperative period.
resultsctDNA was detected in 96% (91/95) of participants at baseline with a median variant allele frequency of 0.15% (range: 0.0011%-38.7%); of these, 10% (9/91) had a variant allele frequency <0.01%. ctDNA detection at cycle 2 (C2) of neoadjuvant therapy was associated with a higher likelihood of distant recurrence (log-rank P = 0.047) and enhanced residual cancer burden prognostication (log-rank P = 0.041). ctDNA was detected prior to distant recurrence in all cases (100% sensitivity) with a median lead time of 417 days (range: 4-1,931 days).
conclusionsThese results demonstrate the clinical validity of ultrasensitive ctDNA detection and monitoring using SVs. Prospective trials are required to evaluate ctDNA-guided treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.