Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39783881›Full record

ArticleAddiction biology2025

Targeting VMPFC-amygdala circuit with TMS in substance use disorder: A mechanistic framework.

Ghazaleh Soleimani, Christine A Conelea, Rayus Kuplicki, Alexander Opitz, Kelvin O Lim, Martin P Paulus, Hamed Ekhtiari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Neural Circuit Mapping and Neurotherapy-Based Strategies.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Four dimensions of individualization in brain stimulation for psychiatric disorders: context, target, dose, and timing.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ghazaleh SoleimaniDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-3418-5260
Christine A ConeleaDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Rayus KuplickiLaureate Institute for Brain Research (LIBR), Oklahoma, USA.
Alexander OpitzDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Kelvin O LimDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Martin P PaulusLaureate Institute for Brain Research (LIBR), Oklahoma, USA.
Hamed EkhtiariDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

Funding

University of Minnesota's Medical Discovery Team on Addiction (MDTA)University of Minnesota's MnDRIVE (Minnesota's Discovery, Research and Innovation Economy)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ventromedial prefrontal cortex (VMPFC), located along the medial aspect of the frontal area, plays a critical role in regulating arousal/emotions. Its intricate connections with subcortical structures, including the striatum and amygdala, highlight the VMPFC's importance in the neurocircuitry of addiction. Due to these features, the VMPFC is considered a promising target for transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in substance use disorders (SUD). By the end of 2023, all 21 studies targeting VMPFC for SUD used anatomical landmarks (e.g., Fp1/Fp2 in the EEG system) to define coil location with a fixed orientation. Nevertheless, one-size-fits-all TMS over VMPFC has yielded variable outcomes. Here, we suggested a pipeline based on a tailored TMS targeting framework aimed at optimally modulating the VMPFC-amygdala circuit on an individual basis. We collected MRI data from 60 participants with methamphetamine use disorders (MUDs). We examined the variability in TMS target location based on task-based functional connectivity between VMPFC and amygdala using psychophysiological interaction (PPI) analysis. Electric fields (EF) were calculated for fixed vs. optimized location (Fp1/Fp2 vs. individualized maximal PPI), orientation (AF7/AF8 vs. optimized algorithm) and intensity (constant vs. adjusted) to maximize target engagement. In our pipeline, the left medial amygdala, identified as the brain region with the highest (0.31 ± 0.29) fMRI drug cue reactivity, was selected as the subcortical seed region. The voxel with the most positive amygdala-VMPFC PPI connectivity in each participant was considered the individualized TMS target (MNI-coordinates: [12.6, 64.23, -0.8] ± [13.64, 3.50, 11.01]). This individualized VMPFC-amygdala connectivity significantly correlated with VAS craving after cue exposure (R = 0.27, p = 0.03). Coil orientation was optimized to increase EF strength over the targeted circuit (0.99 ± 0.21 V/m vs. the fixed approach: Fp1: 0.56 ± 0.22 and Fp2: 0.78 ± 0.25 V/m) and TMS intensity was harmonized across the population. This study highlights the potential of an individualized VMPFC targeting framework to enhance treatment outcomes for addiction, specifically modulating the personalized VMPFC-amygdala circuit.

Indexed as

AmygdalaMagnetic Resonance ImagingPrefrontal CortexTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAdultAmphetamine-Related DisordersFemaleHumansMaleNeural PathwaysSubstance-Related DisordersYoung AdultamygdalafMRI drug cue reactivityfMRI‐informed TMSpersonalized stimulationventromedial prefrontal cortex (VMPFC)

Identifiers

PMID39783881
PMCPMC11714170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.