Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39783835›Full record

ReviewAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2025

Structural Design and Challenges of Micron-Scale Silicon-Based Lithium-ion Batteries.

Wenjie He, Wei Xu, Zhigang Li, Zhaotong Hu, Jia Yang, Gang Qin, Weiming Teng, Tengfei Zhang, Wei Zhang, Zhengming Sun and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Engineering 3D Heterostructured NiCoNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Structural Design and Challenges of Micron-Scale Silicon-Based Lithium-ion Batteries.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Wenjie HeSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, 454003, China.
Wei XuSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, 454003, China.
Zhigang LiSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, 454003, China.
Zhaotong HuCollege of Materials Science and Technology, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, 210016, China.
Jia YangSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, 454003, China.
Gang QinSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, 454003, China.
Weiming TengZhejiang Baima Lake Lab Co Ltd, Hangzhou, 310051, China.
Tengfei ZhangCollege of Materials Science and Technology, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, 210016, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9576-1093
Wei ZhangJiangsu Key Laboratory of Advanced Metallic Materials, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, 211189, China.
Zhengming SunJiangsu Key Laboratory of Advanced Metallic Materials, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, 211189, China.
Xuebin YuDepartment of Materials Science, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433, China.

Funding

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2023M741043 2023M740622Engineering Research Center of Low-carbon Aerospace Power, Ministry of Education CEPE2024021Engineering Research Center of Low-carbon Aerospace Power, Minsitry of Education (No. CEPE2024021) CEPE2024021Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities NG2022005Key R&D Program of Zhejiang 2024SSYS0062National Natural Science Foundation of China 52171180National Natural Science Foundation of China 52302244National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars 51625102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) are at the forefront of energy storage technologies. Silicon-based anodes, with their high capacity and low cost, present a promising alternative to traditional graphite anodes in LIBs, offering the potential for substantial improvements in energy density. However, the significant volumetric changes that silicon-based anodes undergo during charge and discharge cycles can lead to structural degradation. Furthermore, the formation of excessive solid-electrolyte interphases (SEIs) during cycling impedes the efficient migration of ions and electrons. This comprehensive review focuses on the structural design and optimization of micron-scale silicon-based anodes from both materials and systems perspectives. Significant progress is made in the development of advanced electrolytes, binders, and conductive additives that complement micron-scale silicon-based anodes in both half and full-cells. Moreover, advancements in system-level technologies, such as pre-lithiation techniques to mitigate irreversible Li

Indexed as

industrial‐scale applicationsLithium‐ion batteriessilicon‐based anodessolid‐electrolyte interphasesstructural designs

Identifiers

PMID39783835
PMCPMC11809347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.