Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39783027›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of technology assessment in health care2025

Development of a value assessment framework for Health Technology Assessment in rare diseases drugs: insights from a Delphi study in Brazil.

Luiza Vasconcelos Biglia, Arturo Felippini, Tatiane Bomfim Ribeiro, Tácio de Mendonça Lima, Patricia Melo Aguiar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of technology assessment in health care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. A Delphi Study to Identify Priority Indicators for Formulary Selection of Innovative Anticancer Drugs in China.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Luiza Vasconcelos BigliaDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Arturo FelippiniDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Tatiane Bomfim RibeiroFaculty of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4434-748X
Tácio de Mendonça LimaDepartment of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Administration, Federal Fluminense University, Niterói, Brazil.
Patricia Melo AguiarDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3957-4533

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study is to propose and validate a value assessment framework for Health Technology Assessment (HTA) for rare diseases drugs in Brazil.

methodsA scoping review was performed to identify criteria used by HTA agencies in countries with public healthcare systems when evaluating orphan drugs. Based on the findings, a criteria framework for rare disease drugs was proposed for Brazil. Content validity was conducted over three rounds using Delphi technique and content validity ratio (CVR) approach was employed to evaluate the ratings from the eighteen stakeholders (experts and patients).

resultsTwenty-nine HTA criteria for rare disease drugs were identified to compose the Brazilian framework. After three Delphi rounds, the final value framework comprised fifteen criteria categorized into four domains: disease-related factors, treatment-related factors, social and political factors, and economic factors. Among the most well-rated criteria by the CVR, considering the relevance attribute, were "relevance of outcomes for a rare disease," "impact on patient's quality of life," "price negotiation," and "adjusted cost-effectiveness threshold." On the other hand, "budget impact threshold," "innovative nature of treatment," and "willingness to accept greater uncertainty in clinical evidence" received negative evaluations and were excluded from the final framework.

conclusionsA value assessment framework validated by key stakeholders of rare diseases in Brazil could contribute to improve HTA transparency, decision making, and efficiency of the healthcare system, and inspire the development of a local guidance for rare-disease HTA.

Indexed as

Orphan Drug ProductionRare DiseasesTechnology Assessment, BiomedicalBrazilCost-Benefit AnalysisDelphi TechniqueHumansQuality of LifeBrazilian Healthcare Systemhealth technology assessmentrare diseasesvalidation studyvalue assessment framework

Identifiers

PMID39783027
PMCPMC11811954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.