ArticleThe science of diabetes self-management and care2025
Continuous Glucose Monitoring Attrition in Youth With Type 1 Diabetes.
Article in The science of diabetes self-management and care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emotional Challenges Experienced along the Diabetes Technology Journey by Caregivers of Black and Hispanic/Latino Youth with Type 1 Diabetes.Hormone research in paediatrics · 2026Article
- An Ethical Framework for Addressing the Differential Impact of Systemic Racism and Inequities on Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Youth in the United States.Hormone research in paediatrics · 2025Review
- Diabetes Management Through Remote Patient Monitoring: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of Program Enrollment and Attrition.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Barriers and facilitators to continuous glucose monitor use in type 1 diabetes: A biopsychosocial model of the adolescent experience.Health psychology openArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of the study was to identify the most common reasons for and timing of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) attrition in youth with type 1 diabetes (T1DM).
methodsThis single center retrospective chart review included youth with T1DM <22 years seen between November 1, 2021, and October 31, 2022. Data were gathered from CGM cloud-based software and the electronic medical record.
resultsAmong 2663 youth, 88.3% (n = 2351) actively used CGM, and 5.9% (n = 311) had CGM attrition. Those who discontinued CGM were older (17.0 vs 14.9 years,
conclusionsTo support equitable, uninterrupted CGM use, education at CGM initiation should address practical approaches to improve adhesion and wearability and provide a clear pathway to obtaining supplies. Interventions to support sustained CGM use should occur within the first 6 months of initiation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.