Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39781712›Full record

ArticleCurrent pharmaceutical biotechnology2026

Biomimetic Fe

Deepa Mundekkad, William C S Cho

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current pharmaceutical biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Deepa MundekkadDepartment of Biotechnology, Nehru Arts and Science College, Thirumalayampalayam, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, 641105, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8455-0696
William C S ChoDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4174-4586

Funding

Department of Science and Technology (DST), Govt. of India SR/WOS-A/LS-371/2017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIron oxide nanozyme was synthesized from the fruit peel extract of pomegranate, which served as a reducing agent during the green synthesis. The scavenging of reactive oxygen species is often accompanied by immunomodulation following antiproliferative effects due to the crosstalk between the proteins involved in the inter-related signaling pathways.

methodsIn the current study, the green synthesized nanozyme was studied for its ability to induce apoptosis in breast cancer cell lines. The free radical scavenging effect of the nanozyme was reflected as an extension of its intrinsic endogenous enzyme-mimicking property. RESULTS & DISCUSSION: The cell cycle analysis revealed that the cell death induced by nanozyme mainly affected the G0/G1 phase. The expression of RelA/p65 and the inflammatory mediators affected by the nanozyme established the role of the Fe

conclusionThis is the first report on the antiproliferative and immunomodulatory activities expressed by the biomimetic iron oxide nanozyme.

Indexed as

Biomimetic MaterialsBreast NeoplasmsFerric CompoundsFree Radical ScavengersTranscription Factor RelAApoptosisCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationFemaleHumansMCF-7 CellsReactive Oxygen SpeciesFerric CompoundsFree Radical ScavengersReactive Oxygen SpeciesRELA protein, humanTranscription Factor RelAapoptosisBiomimeticcell cycle analysisCOX-2green synthesisimmunomodulationiron oxide nanozymenitric oxideRelA/p65ROS-scavenging

Identifiers

PMID39781712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.