ArticleJournal of feline medicine and surgery2025
Evaluation of a point-of-care test for quantitative determination of total thyroxine in feline serum.
Article in Journal of feline medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of analytical characteristics of the Vcheck C10 point-of-care chemistry analyser for feline sera.Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTotal thyroxine (TT4) evaluation is the most commonly used first-line test for the diagnosis and monitoring of cats with hyperthyroidism. Vcheck T4 is a point-of-care immunoassay that measures TT4 using a Vcheck V200 analyser. This study aimed to evaluate the analytic performance of the Vcheck T4 assay in feline sera and the agreement in the classification of normal, high and low TT4 concentrations of Vcheck T4 with those measured by an enzyme immunoassay (EIA).
methodsAssay precision, reproducibility and linearity were evaluated for the Vcheck T4. For method comparison, TT4 concentrations in 73 serum samples were analysed by both methods.
resultsVcheck T4 demonstrated good precision, reproducibility (intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation between 3% and 13.5%) and linearity in the diagnostic range of <0.5 and >8 μg/dl. The correlation coefficient was 0.87, Passing-Bablok regression showed a proportional, but not constant bias, Bland-Altman plots revealed a mean difference of +0.5 μg/dl. The overall inter-rater agreement ( CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Vcheck T4 assay provided precise and reproducible results in substantial agreement with the EIA. Given the high NPV, Vcheck T4 is useful in ruling out hyperthyroidism when screening cats, but, based on low PPV, samples with results with high TT4 need to be analysed by another reference method. Further analysis with haemolytic, icteric and lipaemic samples is needed to assess the test performance. Finally, the reference intervals provided by the manufacturer require verification, and TT4 intervals specific to this method must be established in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.