Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39781567›Full record

ReviewDiscoveries (Craiova, Romania)

Dynamic Navigation in Dental Implantology.

Lata Goyal, Hariram Sankar, Meghna Dewan, Yeshwanth Perambudhuru

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Discoveries (Craiova, Romania). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lata GoyalPeriodontics Division, Department of Dentistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bathinda, Punjab, India.
Hariram SankarDepartment of Dentistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bathinda, Punjab, India.
Meghna DewanPrivate Practice, Shimla, India.
Yeshwanth PerambudhuruPeriodontics Division, Department of Dentistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bathinda, Punjab, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Implant placement for dental rehabilitation has gained more popularity among patients in the recent past. Dental Implants are the workhorse of dentistry. Previously, the implants were placed with the help of the traditional freehand approach. Even though the conventional technique was successful, it has his own shortcomings. Various methods have been introduced, like stent -guided implant placement and navigation guided implant placement, that enhance the precision of implant position. The three different methods for placing the implants are freehand approach, static navigation and dynamic navigation. Among these approaches, the dynamic navigation system is a promising technology in implant dentistry. The dynamic navigation system is being used successfully in various other fields and is well known for its accuracy. It gives an advantage to clinician by providing real-time three-dimensional position of implant and better clinical and patient related treatment outcomes. This review summarizes- the literature and evidence available on dynamic navigation, its potential application, advantages, disadvantages with future directions.

Indexed as

dental implants. Freehand approachDynamic navigationstatic navigation.

Identifiers

PMID39781567
PMCPMC11709457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.