ArticleCritical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine2024
Olanzapine versus quetiapine in critically ill patients with hyperactive delirium: Protocol for a multicentre, cluster-randomised, double-crossover, pragmatic clinical trial (CALM-ICU).
Article in Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Additional crossovers in cluster randomised crossover trials do not always increase statistical power.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2026Article
- Phenobarbital as an Adjuvant to benzodiazepines when compared to Single-agent benzodiazepine Treatment (usual care) for Alcohol withdrawal syndrome in the intensive care unit (PASTA): a study protocol.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) frequently develop hyperactive delirium, which may be accompanied by behaviour that increases clinical risks to themselves as well as other patients and staff. There is a paucity of evidence to inform the urgent enteral administration of antipsychotic drugs to treat such hyperactive delirium and behavioural disturbances. Objective: The aim of this study is to test the efficacy and safety of administering enteral olanzapine when compared to quetiapine in critically ill patients with hyperactive delirium. Design setting participants and interventions: This is a cluster-randomised, double-crossover, clinical trial. Critically ill adult patients admitted to three tertiary Australian intensive care units over a 12-month period will be eligible. Randomisation will occur at the site level, with allocation to open-label olanzapine or quetiapine use over four treatment periods of 3-month duration. Main outcome measure: The primary outcome and days alive and delirium-/coma-free (censored at 14 days post enrolment) will be analysed using median quantile regression accounting for clustering at sites' level and time period and treatment order. Results and conclusion: This trial will compare the effect of enteral olanzapine to quetiapine in critically ill adults with hyperactive delirium on an important indicator of patient outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.