Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39781486›Full record

ReviewCritical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine2024

Anticoagulation and associated complications in veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adult patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ruan Vlok, Hergen Buscher, Anthony Delaney, Tessa Garside, Gabrielle McDonald, Richard Chatoor, John Myburgh, Priya Nair

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Impella Versus VA-ECMO in Cardiogenic Shock: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis With Exploratory Matched-Cohort Analyses.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ruan VlokRoyal North Shore Hospital, Intensive Care Unit, Sydney, Australia.
Hergen BuscherThe George Institute for Global Health, Critical Care Program, Australia.
Anthony DelaneyRoyal North Shore Hospital, Intensive Care Unit, Sydney, Australia.
Tessa GarsideRoyal North Shore Hospital, Intensive Care Unit, Sydney, Australia.
Gabrielle McDonaldRoyal North Shore Hospital, Intensive Care Unit, Sydney, Australia.
Richard ChatoorRoyal North Shore Hospital, Intensive Care Unit, Sydney, Australia.
John MyburghThe George Institute for Global Health, Critical Care Program, Australia.
Priya NairThe George Institute for Global Health, Critical Care Program, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To describe the incidence of bleeding and thrombotic complications in VA-ECMO according to anticoagulation strategy. Design: This systematic review and meta-analysis included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies reporting bleeding and thrombotic complications in VA-ECMO. The incidence of primary outcomes according to anticoagulation drug and monitoring test was described. Data sources: CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL (2010-January 2024). Review methods: Data was extracted using Covidence. A meta-analysis of proportions was performed using STATA MP v18.1 metaprop. Results: We included 159 studies with 21,942 patients. No studies were at low risk of bias. The incidence of major bleeding or thrombotic events was similar among heparin-, bivalirudin- and anticoagulation-free cohorts. The pooled incidence of major bleeding and thrombotic complications were 40% (95%CI 36-44, I Conclusions: Available literature assessing the association between anticoagulation strategies in VA-ECMO, and bleeding and thrombosis is of limited quality. We identified a substantially higher incidence of major bleeding events than a previous meta-analysis. Limited numbers of patients anticoagulated with alternatives to heparin were reported. Patients with additional mechanical LV unloading represent a cohort at particular risk of bleeding and thrombotic complications.

Indexed as

anticoagulationECLSECMOExtracorporealExtracorporeal life supportMembrane Oxygenation

Identifiers

PMID39781486
PMCPMC11704180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.