ArticleClinical kidney journal2025
Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Single-Molecule Real-Time Sequencing for MUC1 Variable Number of Tandem Repeat Variation to Improve Autosomal Dominant Tubulointerstitial Kidney Disease Diagnosis.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2026Article
- Genome-wide detection and clinical prioritization of tandem repeat outliers using long-read sequencing.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Yield of Whole-Genome Sequencing in Patients With Kidney Failure of Undetermined Etiology at Age 50 Years or Younger.Kidney international reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Frameshift variants in the variable number tandem repeat region of Methods: We recruited patients with suspected kidney failure of undetermined aetiology at ≤50 years and excluded those with a clear-cut clinical or histopathological kidney diagnoses or established genetic kidney diseases identified thorough medical record review. Results: Of 172 recruited patients, 123 underwent SNaPshot analyses, which were abnormal in 5/123 patients (4%). Next, VNtyper genotyping was performed in all patients, including the five with abnormal SNaPshot analysis. VNtyper re-identified the common cytosine duplication in all five patients and revealed novel frameshift variants in two additional patients, while the analyses were normal in the remaining 116 patients. All patients carrying frameshift variants in Conclusions: ADTKD-
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.