Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39781427›Full record

ArticleProgress in rehabilitation medicine2025

Calculation of the Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Upper and Lower Limb Motor Assessment in Spinal Muscular Atrophy.

Takatoshi Hara, Yuta Miyazaki, Yuko Shimizu-Motohashi, Daisuke Nishida, Akiko Kamimura, Mizuki Takeuchi, Yosuke Ariake, Ayaka Tsubouchi, Tasuku Inaba, Taiyo Kawaguchi and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Progress in rehabilitation medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Takatoshi HaraDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, National Center Hospital, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuta MiyazakiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, National Center Hospital, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuko Shimizu-MotohashiDepartment of Child Neurology, National Center Hospital, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan.
Daisuke NishidaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, National Center Hospital, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan.
Akiko KamimuraDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, National Center Hospital, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan.
Mizuki TakeuchiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, National Center Hospital, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan.
Yosuke AriakeDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, National Center Hospital, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan.
Ayaka TsubouchiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, National Center Hospital, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan.
Tasuku InabaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, National Center Hospital, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan.
Taiyo KawaguchiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, National Center Hospital, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan.
Hirofumi KomakiDepartment of Child Neurology, National Center Hospital, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan.
Masahiro AboDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Physical function assessments in patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) are important indicators for assessing the effectiveness of treatment and changes over time in rehabilitation therapy. However, few reports exist on this indicator. This study calculated the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for assessing motor function in the upper and lower limbs of individuals with SMA to estimate the degree of change within a functional score that is considered clinically meaningful. Methods: This cohort study relied on individual participant measurements. A distribution-based approach was used to calculate the MCID values, incorporating data from 26 patients with SMA for the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale Expanded (HFMSE), Revised Upper Limb Module (RULM), and grip and pinch strength. Results: The standard errors of measurement for all patients were: 58.38 m for 6MWT; 4.71 points for HFMSE; 3.25 points for RULM; 10.93 N and 9.86 N for right and left grip strength, respectively; 5.42 N and 4.73 N for right and left Palmar pinch; and 11.96 N and 8.66 N for right and left Key pinch. Significant correlations were observed between the physical function assessments. Conclusions: We calculated MCID values for physical function evaluations of SMA and, as a sub-analysis, determined the SMA type and ambulatory status. These findings are expected to contribute to future SMA treatment and rehabilitation and promote the selection of appropriate physical function assessments.

Indexed as

6-minute walk testminimal clinically important differencephysical function assessmentspinal muscular atrophy

Identifiers

PMID39781427
PMCPMC11704608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.