ArticleInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry2024
Acceptance of Parents toward Hand-over-mouth Exercise and Other Behavior Management Techniques for Pediatric Dental Care in the 21st Century: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies.
Article in International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acceptability of oral health care: a scoping review of reviews to inform framework development.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- A perspective on shifting trends in paediatric behaviour management.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2026Review
- Parental Acceptance of Pediatric Dentistry Behavior Management Techniques and Its Relationship to Parental Dental Anxiety and Experience in Dubai.Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community DentistryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hand-over-mouth exercise (HOME) is an aversive technique for child behavior management in a dental office. HOME has been omitted from various guidelines and certain teaching curricula due to legal and ethical issues. This systematic review meta-analysis (SRMA) was undertaken to understand the acceptance of parents toward HOME in comparison with that of other behavior management techniques (BMTs). Objectives: This SRMA compared parental acceptance for HOME and other BMTs from observational studies reported in the literature from 1 Methodology: Two authors independently searched data from the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar, and others. Twenty-one studies remained in the systematic review, of which eleven could be included in the meta-analysis. Based on the summary findings of 1,034 participants from 10 studies, we compared parents' acceptance for HOME vs other BMTs [voice control (VC), tell-show-do (TSD), physical restraint-active (PR-A), physical restraint-passive (PR-P), parental separation (PS), conscious sedation (CS), general anesthesia (GA), oral premedication (OP), and positive reinforcement (PR)]. Data analyses were carried out using RevMan 5.3. The Joanna Briggs Risk of Bias (JB-ROB) tool for cross-sectional analytical studies was used for bias assessment. A funnel plot was used to detect publication bias. Results: Of 20 studies, nine studies reported higher acceptance for GA than HOME; seven reported higher acceptance for HOME than GA, and the remaining four appeared inconclusive. The meta-analysis results (eleven studies) based on forest plots with fixed effects models in terms of OR (CI) indicated no statistically significant difference in the acceptance for HOME vs GA [1.03 (0.84, 1.25)], CS [0.77 (0.60, 1.00)], and PR-P [1.21 (0.92, 1.59)]. In comparison with the acceptance for HOME, CS (NO) [0.65 (0.51, 0.84)], VC [0.48 (0.39, 0.59)], TSD [0.04 (0.03, 0.05)], PR-A [0.65 (0.50, 0.84)], PS [0.28 (0.22, 0.36)], OP [0.55 (0.39, 0.78)], distraction [0.11 (0.09, 0.15)], and PR [0.06 (0.04, 0.08)] were preferred; these being statistically significant. Heterogeneity values (I Conclusion: No statistically significant difference was seen in the acceptance for HOME vs GA, CS, and PR-P. BMTs such as TSD, VC, PR-A, PS, CS (NO), OP, distraction, and PR were preferred to HOME; the difference in acceptance being statistically significant. The differences in acceptance between HOME vs CS (NO) and PR-A did not remain statistically significant when random effects models were used. The heterogeneity was high, the ROB was moderate, and the publication bias was minimal. How to cite this article: Jawdekar A, Tafti F, Deolikar S,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.