Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39781371›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of MS care2025

PANORAMA: A 2021 Clinician Survey of Treatment Approaches for People With New Diagnoses of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in the United Kingdom.

Nikos Evangelou, Miriam Mattoscio, Mhairi Coutts, Manoharan Andiappan, Teresa Sawtell, Katherine Rhys

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of MS care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nikos EvangelouFrom the Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences Academic Unit, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2871-0672
Miriam MattoscioMS Service, Queen's Hospital, Barking Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Essex, United Kingdom.
Mhairi CouttsDouglas Grant Rehabilitation Centre, Ayrshire Central Hospital, Ayrshire, United Kingdom.
Manoharan AndiappanReal-World Evidence, OPEN Health, London, United Kingdom.
Teresa SawtellNovartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd, London, United Kingdom.
Katherine RhysNovartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe PANORAMA survey aimed to assess current treatment practice for individuals with new diagnoses of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) in the United Kingdom and to explore variations in treatment approaches with an emphasis on escalation vs early high-efficacy treatment (HET) and treatment goals.

methodsHealth care professionals (HCPs) from the UK treating patients with RRMS took part in interviews facilitated by a structured questionnaire. Data were analyzed descriptively using quantitative or qualitative methods, as appropriate.

resultsThirty-eight HCPs from 38 UK centers took part in the survey, including 20 MS consultants and 13 MS specialist nurses. Seventy-four percent (n = 28 of 38) of HCPs strongly agreed and 24% (9 of 38) agreed that early treatment is essential for better outcomes. HCPs reported that they currently treat a mean (SD) of 58.3% (20.8%) and 42.1% (21.8%) of patients with new diagnoses of RRMS with early HET or escalation approaches, respectively. Thirty-four percent (13 of 38) of HCPs reported a discrepancy between current treatment approach and the approach they would like to take, which would be 66.2% favoring early HET and 33.8% favoring escalation approaches. The factors influencing the choice of treatment approach were overall patient health profile (45%, 17 of 38) and patient choice (39%, 15 of 38). The most important treatment goals were to reduce relapses (63%, 24 of 38), delay disability progression (58%, 22 of 38), and maintain quality of life (50%, 19 of 38).

conclusionsThe survey highlights variation among HCPs in the UK in current vs ideal use of escalation or early HET approaches and factors influencing choice of treatment approach.

Indexed as

decision-makingescalationhigh-efficacyrelapsing-remittingtreatmentUnited Kingdomvariation

Identifiers

PMID39781371
PMCPMC11704533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.