Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39781337›Full record

ReviewGlobal mental health (Cambridge, England)2025

Early intervention in psychosis programs in Africa, Asia and Latin America; challenges and recommendations.

Els van der Ven, Xinyu Yang, Franco Mascayano, Karl J Weinreich, Eric Yh Chen, Charmaine Yz Tang, Sung-Wan Kim, Jonathan K Burns, Bonginkosi Chiliza, Greeshma Mohan and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Global mental health (Cambridge, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Els van der VenDepartment of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5103-7186
Xinyu YangDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Franco MascayanoNew York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3118-504X
Karl J WeinreichDepartment of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7115-3631
Eric Yh ChenDepartment of Psychiatry, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Charmaine Yz TangDepartment of Psychosis, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore.
Sung-Wan KimDepartment of Psychiatry, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.
Jonathan K BurnsDepartment of Psychiatry, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Bonginkosi ChilizaDepartment of Psychiatry, Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, University of Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa.
Greeshma MohanSchizophrenia Research Foundation (SCARF), Chennai, India.
Srividya N IyerDepartment of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Thara RangawsamySchizophrenia Research Foundation (SCARF), Chennai, India.
Ralph de VriesMedical Library, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ezra S SusserDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7665-4826

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: While early intervention in psychosis (EIP) programs have been increasingly implemented across the globe, many initiatives from Africa, Asia and Latin America are not widely known. The aims of the current review are (a) to describe population-based and small-scale, single-site EIP programs in Africa, Asia and Latin America, (b) to examine the variability between programs located in low-and-middle income (LMIC) and high-income countries in similar regions and (c) to outline some of the challenges and provide recommendations to overcome existing obstacles. Methods: EIP programs in Africa, Asia and Latin America were identified through experts from the different target regions. We performed a systematic search in Medline, Embase, APA PsycInfo, Web of Science and Scopus up to February 6, 2024. Results: Most EIP programs in these continents are small-scale, single-site programs that serve a limited section of the population. Population-based programs with widespread coverage and programs integrated into primary health care are rare. In Africa, EIP programs are virtually absent. Mainland China is one of the only LMICs that has begun to take steps toward developing a population-based EIP program. High-income Asian countries (e.g. Hong Kong and Singapore) have well-developed, comprehensive programs for individuals with early psychosis, while others with similar economies (e.g. South Korea and Japan) do not. In Latin America, Chile is the only country in the process of providing population-based EIP care. Conclusions: Financial resources and integration in mental health care, as well as the availability of epidemiological data on psychosis, impact the implementation of EIP programs. Given the major treatment gap of early psychosis in Africa, Latin America and large parts of Asia, publicly funded, locally-led and accessible community-based EIP care provision is urgently needed.

Indexed as

Early intervention programsfirst episode psychosislow- and middle income countriesstigmatask-shiftingtraditional healers

Identifiers

PMID39781337
PMCPMC11704378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.